fbpx

The Curious NBA Draft Case of Jaden McDaniels

Jaden McDaniels has a lot of potential upside, but a team like the Kings might not be the best fit.
By | 26 Comments | Jul 8, 2020

The allure of upside is one of the most addictive things in sports. Too often, teams, fans, and armchair scouts judge players based on what type of player they could become, and not what type of player they are or are even likely to become. For every Kawhi Leonard, there is a Jimmer Freddette; for every Dragan Bender, a Buddy Hield; and for every Luka Doncic, there’s a €œwe like his upside more€ guy. 

There may not be a more €œupside€ guy in the 2020 NBA Draft class than Jaden McDaniels, a 6’10 forward with an enticing combination of tools for the modern game. He’s a solid shooter with extra size (a reported 6’11 wingspan), quickness, and potential versatility on both ends. In a league that begs for size and shooting ability, the physical comparison to Kevin Durant – an extreme hyperbolic and insulting comparison though it is – has been thrown around. Any team would love a young player who can shoot off the dribble and has the wingspan to keep the shot out of a defender’s reach.

 

But after a single season at Washington, McDaniel’s question marks outweigh his clear upside, and the case against drafting him in the lottery – or arguably, even the first round – is pretty clear when you watch the tape and consider his stats. I ranked McDaniels at 23rd on my first Big Board in April, but he’ll be lower than that on my next update. He’s dropped for both armchair scouts and experts; ESPN has him 22nd on their latest Big Board, and The Athletic’s Sam Vecenie has him 41st.

I believe McDaniels could still develop into a starter-level player, if he ends up with a team that has a proven track record of optimizing players. If his decision making improves and he develops more as a catch-and-shoot guy, he could be a solid 3-and-D wing who can beat defenders on the overplay with his long limbs and good quickness. But given his innate tendencies with the ball in his hands, he’s a complicated player for any developing team to optimize, especially if he’s selected in the lottery and comes with elevated expectations. 

McDaniels’ shooting tools are clear; he has a quick pull-up shot, a smooth stroke, and an extra-high release point. He could rise above nearly any collegiate defender and get a shot up.

If the tape ended there, he’d be hailed as a star level prospect, but McDaniels’ efficiency didn’t live up to his early season hype: 40.5% from the field, 33.9% from deep, and a 51.5% true shooting percentage. Per Synergy Stats, 73% of McDaniel’s shot attempts in the half-court came off jumpers, and he finished the season shooting just 35% on them (53rd percentile). Even his off-the-dribble shot, the most alluring part of his game, sits in the 54th percentile. Those aren’t impressive enough numbers for a player who needs the shot to be gold in order to justify playing time. Direct player comparisons can be like comparing apples to onions, considering the variance in college basketball teams’ styles and paces, but among the wings and forwards considered in the late-lottery/first-round range – Devin Vassell, Aaron Nesmith, Saddiq Bey, Josh Green, Patrick Williams, and Desmond Bane – McDaniels has the second highest usage rate (25.6%, second only to Nesmith) and is last in TS%. 

An efficiency in McDaniels’ game comes in his catch-and-shoot shot, an underused part of his game at Washington; he sank 39.5% (83rd percentile) on 66 attempts, per Synergy. The best scenario for McDaniels is to end up on a team with established creators that sees Jaden as an ancillary off-ball scorer early in his career, emphasizing his catch-and-shoot ability and size as a cutter. He doesn’t have the shooting consistency of the other first-round wings in this class, but he has a stronger likelihood of becoming an efficient shooter than someone who can create offense off of the dribble.

McDaniels has a solid handle and great end-to-end quickness for a player at his size, giving him capable grab-and-go game that should be unlocked with NBA spacing. But the downside to McDaniels’ dribbling ability is his determination to use it; he wants to drive to the basket, but really struggles to get by set defenders off the dribble. And when he can find his way towards the paint, he has no answer for what to do when he hits a wall of defenders. By the time conference season rolled around, Pac-12 teams knew what to do when they saw McDaniels coming off screens and heading downhill – get in his way and disrupt the ball.

https://streamable.com/a2z2nt

McDaniels shot just 55.9% at the rim, according to Hoop-Math, emphasizing both his lack of touch in the paint and his inability to find buckets when his skinny frame meets contact around the basket. That percentage is again the worst of any of the 1st round wings mentioned earlier. Jaden may be long and quick, but he is not a smooth vertical athlete, and he doesn’t have the pop off the dribble to finish over a crowded paint. He needs space and time to load off both feet if he’s going to reach his peak. While his decent footspeed and length gives him an advantage, his lack of explosiveness and the decision making he showed at Washington doesn’t give me faith that he’ll be a capable face-up scorer at the next level. 

McDaniels is also an underwhelming playmaker. He showcases a sharp pass or two per contest, but many of those come only after he’s run out of dribbling room. He finished the season with a 0.6/1 assist-to-turnover ratio, and was 2nd in the Pac-12 with 100 turnovers – a whopping 4.2 per 40 minutes. If his future team emphasizes using him as a tertiary scorer and limits his dribble drives, it wouldn’t surprise me to see his turnover numbers plummet and his assist numbers jump – but that again requires a team to have a clear vision of how to utilize him in a way he was not at Washington.

Defensively, there reason for both optimism and pessimism about McDaniels’ potential. Washington’s 2-3 zone clouded much of McDaniels’ defensive tape, but he’s clearly too skinny to make an immediate impact in the NBA, and his length and quickness will only compensate so much for his lack of burst. Surprisingly, given his length and quickness, his steal numbers are absurdly low – just 1 steal per 40 minutes, and a 1.4% steal rate(!) – but he did show numerous flashes over the season as a capable and dedicated weakside rim protector. Indeed, his speed and toughness often shrone strongest through his willingness to flash inside and disrupt otherwise open dunks or layups. 

https://streamable.com/lyf1sk

Finally, McDaniels also led the Pac-12 in both fouls (103, 3.3 per game) and technical fouls (6).

No 19-year-old kid should be overly judged for their emotions on the basketball court, but there were times where McDaniels’ decision making cost the Huskies badly

While McDaniels’ rough season at Washington is considered a disappointment for a player once considered a high-lottery lock, it may end up helping him over the course of his career. If he does fall towards the end of the first round, he could end up with a smart team like Miami, Utah, Boston, or Toronto, who could better optimize him in a smaller offensive role while lowering immediate expectations. 

Jaden is not a player the Sacramento Kings should look to select with their possible lottery pick. Sacramento already has enough complicated fits on the roster, and have not proven they can properly optimize project players. A smart team with the right pieces around him could figure out how turn him into a promising multi-level shooter… but I’m not convinced that team is Sacramento.

Patreon Membership
* indicates required


To prevent spam, our system flags comments that include too many hyperlinks. If you would like to share a comment with multiple links, make sure you email [email protected] for it to be approved.
Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MaybeNextYear
Original Member
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Comments
Vote Up
July 8, 2020 10:21 am

He sounds like the type of guy you take a swing on in the second round if he’s available.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 8, 2020 10:36 am
Reply to  MaybeNextYear

I have a hard time seeing a draft board where he’s my favorite pick for the Kings (current draft slots) before their 53 slot.

Brenden
Member
Comments
Comments
July 8, 2020 11:13 am
Reply to  MaybeNextYear

I absolutely think Sacramento should take him with their Detroit 2nd at 35 if he is there. That being said, I think there is very little chance that he makes it out of the first round with his potential upside.

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
July 8, 2020 10:24 am

There is certainly still upside for McDaniels, if he ends up in the right situation with a proven track record of optimizing players. comment image?itemid=3447966

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 8, 2020 10:33 am

Nice breakdown, Bryant. And I agree. His measurements and smooth stroke alone probably put his floor in the mid-2nd round, but I’m not sure I’d take him anywhere. His decision-making, reading of the game, and motor are just not apparent at all at this point. And his profile (long, range-y tall guys with perimeter skills) isn’t as rare as it once was. Last season alone we saw guys like Doumbouya, Bazley, and even Claxton bring McDaniel’s loose profile with more ancillary skills.
 
I also have some real bias in play here, of course. I think I’ve made pretty clear that BBIQ, passing and effort level are among the most important attributes in my book, and from what I’ve seen McDaniels doesn’t pass muster in any of them.

RikSmits
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 8, 2020 11:03 am

that BBIQ, passing and effort level are among the most important attributes in my book, and from what I’ve seen McDaniels doesn’t pass muster in any of them.

Sounds like a guy Vlade would love to have. Too bad he isn’t from a bigger school.

RikSmits
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 8, 2020 11:06 am

Finally, McDaniels also led the Pac-12 in both fouls (103, 3.3 per game) and technical fouls (6).

No 19-year-old kid should be overly judged for their emotions on the basketball court

Oh yeah, just the kind of player we know how to help develop properly, right DeMarcus? DeMarcus?

Adamsite
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
July 8, 2020 11:34 am

If he is a project player, then Sacramento is definitely not the place for him. The Kings haven’t developed a player since the Adelman era, and I don’t see that happening anytime soon. Watch him go to Miami, Toronto, San Antonio, etc and become a valuable rotational player.

LandParkJimmer
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
July 8, 2020 1:56 pm
Reply to  Adamsite

Agree 100%. It’s crazy how many players leave the Kings and become better almost over night. I’m still in shock over how well Ben McLemore played on the Rockets after never doing anything for us lol

1951
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 8, 2020 3:32 pm
Reply to  LandParkJimmer

Some of that is due to a lack of good coaching. Coaches who recognize strengths and weaknesses and who have the courage and ability to put the players in the best position to highlight strengths and mask weaknesses tend to get more out of role players than do the Kings.
 
Just compare what Joerger got out of Buddy, Fox and even Bagley to a small degree. He has been about the only coach that comes close to having both the courage and skill to do this. Otherwise, it’s mostly been a coaching wasteland on that front around here and I have yet to see any evidence from Walton (in LA or here) that suggests he is the guy to do this well.
 

Last edited 3 years ago by 1951
Kingsguru21
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
July 8, 2020 3:11 pm
Reply to  Adamsite

Well put Adam. Especially about the lack of development over the last 15 years.
 

Last edited 3 years ago by Kingsguru21
1951
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 8, 2020 3:29 pm
Reply to  Adamsite

While I agree that our “development” efforts have sucked, I do think it is a combination of both bad drafting and bad development.
 
Talent rises, even in shit environments. Heck, even here guys like IT and Boogie “developed” somewhat. Fox is “developing” despite the lack of good team building.
 
 
 
 

Adamsite
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
July 8, 2020 5:02 pm
Reply to  1951

Part of me wonder is DMC had been drafted by the Spurs or Heat, he’d have been a much different player by now. Injuries aside, he might have had a title or two in one of those systems.

1951
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 8, 2020 12:31 pm

Kings drafts have made me Jaden about it all.

AirmaxPG
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
July 8, 2020 1:10 pm

If we stay around the 12th pick, I think my early favorite is Nesmith. Small sample this year (only 14 games), but 52% from 3 on over 8 shots a game is worth a shot in the late lottery.

Adamsite
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
July 8, 2020 5:44 pm
Reply to  AirmaxPG

My deep dark desire is that if we are at #12, Vlade picks up the phone and looks to package it with Buddy and parts to get Beal.
 
Fox, Beal, Bogi, Barnes and Holmes…oh mama!

AirmaxPG
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
July 9, 2020 8:23 am
Reply to  Adamsite

I don’t think the Wizards are that dumb… but it’s possible. I mean yeah, if we can fleece somebody for an all-star in their prime then we should definitely do that.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 9, 2020 8:56 am
Reply to  Adamsite

Who knows what Tommy Sheppard is going to do. Having Wall’s albatross makes for some weird calculus. I suppose if they decide that Wall’s contract means a rebuild it unrealistic, then they might be interested in putting Hield next to Wall and trying to sneak into the playoffs for the next couple years. To some degree Wall’s greatest skill has been getting people open 3s. But I would presume it would take a lot more than Hield + #12 to get Beal. I would guess they’d prefer a future un-or-very-lightly protected 1st + Bagley or two future lightly protected 1sts.
 
If they ARE going to rebuild, I doubt Hield would be considered an attractive option since he’s already in his prime and on a market rate-ish deal.
 
ALL that said, I do think the idea of packaging #12 with some real non-Fox assets to add a high-level player is interesting.

AirmaxPG
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
July 9, 2020 9:41 am

I think the Bulls are an interesting trade partner. I still like Otto Porter, even with that contract and recent injuries. Just hasn’t been a good fit in Chicago. And Markkanen is reportedly on the block as well.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 9, 2020 10:56 am
Reply to  AirmaxPG

Yeah, again, I have no real idea what direction they’re going to go in with their new FO in place. Personally, I would probably try to sell high on Lavine and hold onto the Carter, Markannen, Porter front court for another season as I think their potential production likely outweighs their market value.
White, Dunn/Satoransky, Porter, Markannen, Carter actually offers some theoretically nice fits in skillsets. I mean, they won’t be good. But they could at least be cohesive (with a different coach). Ultimately, White/Dunn/Satoranksy/Gafford is probably more the makings of an interesting 2nd unit, but building will take some work and who know, maybe they can get some good present talent for Lavine.

AirmaxPG
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
July 9, 2020 11:26 am

Yeah it’s tough to say what they will do. The old FO would probably build around Lavine, but the new one may go a different direction.
 
But IF they did want to build around Lavine… how about a Buddy/Bagley for Porter/Markkanen swap? Think that’s enough?

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 9, 2020 11:35 am
Reply to  AirmaxPG

I don’t know. The value may be close enough to start talks. I’m not sure I see Hield or Bagley as especially good targets for building around LaVine. I mean, LaVine/Hield is a comically terrible defensive backcourt. But I’ve been severely wrong on these things before.

Adamsite
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
July 8, 2020 2:30 pm

Just the thought of drafting another 6’10” player go me thinking… In a game dominated by wings ranging from 6’6″ to 6’9″ how many have the Kings drafted in recent memory?
 
I save you the long ugly details of each draft, but the ONLY wing player that Vlade drafted in the first round, technically wasn’t even his pick. Justin Jackson was drafted by Portland and traded to Sac on draft night for ironically a big man in Zach Collins. In fact the previous “wing” player prior to Jackson that was selected by the Kings was Omri Casspi back in 2009, the rest were guards or bigs. That’s right, there hasn’t been a single legit wing player drafted by the Kings in the Vivek era. That’s NBA 3.0, folks.
 
For reference, in a 9 year span in the era of bigs, Petrie drafted Peja, Hedo, Gerald Wallace, Kevin Martin and Francisco Garcia.
 
In Vlade’s 5 drafts as GM (only 4 having a first round pick), Vlade has acquired 5 bigs 6’10” and above (Bagley, Giles, Skal, PapaG, WCS), 1 PG (Fox), 1SG (Bogi via trade, for a big man in Chriss) and 1 SF/Wing (Jackson via trade for a big man in Collins)
 
Would it surprise anyone if he selected someone like McDaniels, because you know…he’s tall.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
July 8, 2020 5:58 pm
Reply to  Adamsite

I don’t think the issue is drafting tall guys. It’s that the game has moved to the perimeter and the guys that Divac has drafted don’t have perimeter skills. If a guy has perimeter skills and functional perimeter mobility then the taller the better. Both Peja and Hedo were the same height as McDaniels. Obviously, ain’t nothing wrong with drafting 6’10 and up when those guys are like Giannis, Simmons, Durant, Jokic, Adebayo, Sabonis, etc. That 6’6 to 6’9 range is a nice one for your role players because it generally offers a lot of versatility, but the game is still dominated by elite playmakers. That group includes little guys like Lillard and huge guys like Giannis.

Adamsite
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
July 8, 2020 6:33 pm

Solid points.

Kingsguru21
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
July 10, 2020 9:45 am

You see, your title is misleading Bryant. What’s going on here isn’t so much that McDaniels is a mystery as much as is he is close but no cigar and previous draft stock makes him seem like a greater disappointment.
 
But in reality, it seems like Jaden McDaniels is more a dime a dozen prospect than anything. Leaves something to be desired on the headline, though.
 
Good piece.

Badge Legend

Patreon Supporter Patreon Supporter   Registered On Day 1 Registered On Day 1   Published Post Published Post  Published Post Nostradumbass
Comment Up Votes 200 Up Votes   Comment Up Votes 500 Up Votes    1,000 Up Votes    3,000+ Up Votes

Comments 50 Comments   Comments 100 Comments    250 Comments    500 Comments    1000+ Comments