Nique Clifford enters the league as a potential Swiss Army knife and a statsheet to prove he can shoot, drive, pass, rebound, and defend at promising levels. (All hyperlinks in this profile are video clips showcasing the skills discussed.) He averaged 18.9 points, 9.6 rebounds, 4.4 assists, and 1.2 steals a game last year while shooting 49.6% from the field and 37.7% from deep – he led the Colorado State Rams in points, assists, rebounds, steals, and shots. At 6’5 without shoes, a 6’8 wingspan, and real bounce to his game, he’s an actual-to-goodness NBA wing, a position the Sacramento Kings have not drafted in the 1st round since Francisco Garcia exactly 20 freaking seasons ago.
Nique had a winding road to the NBA across his five years of collegiate ball. He spent the first three years at Colorado as a defense-first role player whose shooting efficiencies may have held back his offensive touches. He transferred to Colorado State after his junior year where he earned a much bigger offensive role and took massive steps forward across the board. He tested the 2024 NBA Draft waters and was invited to the Combine, but opted to return to the Rams for his final year of eligibility, where he had his breakout season and got Colorado State within striking distance of the Sweet 16 before Derik Queen and Maryland ended their season with a buzzer beater.
On Offense
The swing skill for Nique’s success will be his shooting ability. His shot numbers fluctuated at Colorado, and in his final year with the Buffaloes he shot 37.4% from the field and 28.8% from deep. His mechanics were a big focus when he joined the Rams, and he showed marked improvement over the last two years, jumping to 52.2% from the field and 37.7% from deep in 2023-24 and 49.6% from the field and 37.7% from deep in his final year, excellent efficiencies considering his offensive usage. He showcased a deadly pull-up game and hit 47.3% on pull-up 2s and 38.8% on pull-up threes, per Synergy Sports, and hit shots off screens and off movement.
That said, as Sam Vecenie pointed out in his Draft Guide at the Athletic, Nique goes through wide stretches of consistency and inconsistency: “This year, Clifford made six of his first nine 3s, then shot 29 percent over his next 100 3-point attempts, then drilled 58 percent of his 3s in his final nine games.” He normally shoots with solid balance and excellent footwork, but he also doesn’t have a very fast shot. His ability to shoot off the catch will also be key as he finds a role in the NBA, but per Synergy Sports, he was a better pull-up deep shooter (38.8%) than he was off the catch (35.8%).
The improvement in those final two years gives hope that he’s an NBA-level shooter, and he’s got more of a track record than many of the questionable shooters Sacramento has gambled on in recent years. But it’s a skill that absolutely needs to translate for Clifford to be the steal of the draft that Scott Perry hopes he can be. Much of the rest of his on-ball game, be it his ability to attack the rim off of closeouts and playmaking skills, relies on him being a threat to shoot the basketball with success.
Clifford is a three-level scorer who is aggressive on drives to the basket and isn’t afraid of contact; he hit 66% of his shots at the rim in 2025. His length, pop, quickness, and strength allowed him to blast past defenders and power through rim protectors. Another swing skill will be his handling – his dribbling can be loose in traffic and there will be a massive jump from trying to create versus MWC opponents to doing the same verses NBA opponents. For him to become more than a role player, he’ll need to be able to create more than the straight-line drives he thrived on at Colorado State.
Clifford’s greatest skill may be his passing. He thrived at reading defenses in the pick-and-roll and in transition, and he can throw absolute darts. NBA Draft Analyst Ben Pfeifer had a great video breaking down Clifford’s playmaking ability, particularly how he could manipulate defenders before riffling unexpected passes. From the games I watched, Colorado State didn’t run a heliocentric offense around Nique—he shared handling responsibilities with sharpshooter guard Kyan Evans—and the idea of Clifford translating into a surprise large point guard in the NBA isn’t backed by his college usage or his current on-ball creation ability. But you can never have enough smart secondary playmakers on the court.
On Defense
Clifford’s game film shows a lot of reason for optimism on defense. Nique is an engaged, impactful defender who plays with physicality and focus. He is strong against contact, isn’t afraid of bodying up to dudes much bigger than he is, and is active off the ball and eager to fly in as a free safety. In addition, Clifford was also one of the best rebounders in college basketball last year; he was 10th in the NCAA in total rebounds and tied for 14th for double-doubles. It cannot be overstated how good it is to see a dude who led his team in shots also be the one who took on guarding the opponent’s best perimeter player and consistently fought hard for rebounding position. There’s a chance his defensive upside is being overstated given some player comparisons—more on that later—and he will be undersized to match up against the bigger small forwards in the NBA. But Nique’s tape just shows a dude who has strong defensive instincts and the length and strength to mix it up.
Older Prospect
Much is made of Clifford’s age: at 23 years old and having spent 5 years in college, he was the oldest player drafted in the 1st round. Having watched almost no prospect tape this season, I cannot rattle off a list of younger players who the Kings could have drafted at 24 instead. But the NBA has seen plenty of older prospects who were jack-of-all-trades in college and masters-of-none in the NBA, such as Denzel Valentine, Chris Duarte, and Chandler Hutchison. That said, the league is also full of late-blooming players (Jalen Williams, Austin Reaves, Jimmy Butler, and Desmond Bane) who all had three or more seasons in college and excelled later than their counterparts. That said AGAIN, Clifford is also older than any of those dudes when entering the NBA, so we’ll just have to see if Clifford’s extra experience makes him an immediate contributor as Perry alluded to in his press conference last week.
Many Kings fans and commentators have shared NBADraft.Net’s comparison of Nique to his new head coach Doug Christie. After hearing that one, it was hard for me—a fan who grew up with Doug as his favorite King—not to see the similar defensive motor and playmaking fire, along with Clifford and Doug’s similar size and athletic gifts. It’s impossible to predict that Nique’s on-ball defense could ever compare to one of the best defenders in franchise history, and doing so massively over inflates Clifford’s current defensive ability. But Kings fans should hope this lights a fire in both Nique and Christie to bring out the best in Clifford.
For more on Clifford, I encourage you to check out our buddy SPTSJUNKIE’s breakdown on Clifford as a prospect over at NBA Draft Network. I’m higher on Clifford’s defensive tape and upside than he was, but I also am in firm agreement on the comparison to former King Francisco Garcia (who again, was the last wing Sacramento drafted in the 1st round.
Welcome to Basketball Hell. Jokes aside, honestly wishing you all the best.

A room full of two narcissits and endless yes men. What could possibly have gone wrong?!
Doesn’t seem like Vivek has learned much since then.
I feel like this was a REAL targeted ad for this site haha
Oh man, this is seeing one of your favorite bands come back and put on an elite performance for a reunion tour.
Love the write up Bryant. Really good observations and obviously agree with a lot as you noted from my report.
And agree, that shot will be a major swing skill. It’s a bit slow and awkward and one of the bigger flags with Nique is his performance against Top 50 schools, which was materially worse than his performance against lesser programs. And a lot of that was driven by differences in his shooting against higher level competition.
My hope is that he was the focal point of the offense against those programs and playing in more of a secondary or tertiary capacity will remove some of that pressure and let him pick his spots to be more efficient. But even then, he will benefit a lot from speeding up that jumper while keeping the accuracy.
Great write-up. Hope he ends up at least as good a the last wing we drafted in the first round.
Too soon!!!
LOL. I was not here during the Cisco years, but read he got hurt because of exercise ball explosion. That’s crazy stuff.
Yeah, lifting weights while on the ball. Broke his wrist I think.
I don’t like the pick and if Kam Jones becomes the better player who I preferred or Tyrese Proctor, then this stings. Only time will tell but the fact he is streaky and goes through inconsistencies is a fucking red flag. Where have we seen this shit before?
The only example that I can think of is everyone who’s ever picked up a basketball.
If anyone is doing more thorough player breakdowns than Bryant West, they’re being paid a nice pile of money. Excellent work as always, sir.
So the opposite then.
🙂
Apparently Schroeder was a sign and trade, absorbing him in to the TPE from the Huerter trade to the Bulls. Kinga have the full MLE to use now. Don’t know what is being sent to Detroit.
Full MLE to go make another move that won’t really matter, probably.
The deal (as it currently stands) is a simple Free Agent signing for the full MLE, no S&T. The Kings still have the Bi-Annual which is up $5.1M (Ben Simmons anyone?)
There is a possibility that the deal turns into a Sign & Trade if the Kings and Pistons want to work something out. Any S&T would require a min 3yr deal which is what the Kings offered to Schroder. If the Schroder signing turns into a S&T, that would hard-cap the Kings (as would any other S&T) but they would get the full MLE back to use this year.
The Deteoit Free Press just reported the sign and trade like 30 minutes ago.
A sign and trade requires a trade . Who was traded ?
Omari Sankofa II: Source: The Dennis Schröder signing will be a sign-and-trade between the Pistons and Kings. That will allow the Pistons to take back up to $22.6 million, or will generate a player exception worth $14.3 million if they don’t take a player back. Either way, they gain flexibility. 1 hour ago – via x.com
It could be a future pick, rights to a player, a kings player, or a 3-team deal (if that’s allowed under this CBA with a sign and trade)
I would be happy with Thompson, Holland, or Klintman, but if they are out of reach, then I hope just we get a draft asset coming back (although I’d be fine with sending some draft asset their way for Thompson or Holland).
If we aren’t rebalancing the roster with a playable forward, I’d really rather keep Monk (I’d accept an FRP too, but I don’t think that is in the cards).
nevermind [sad face], it would be for Kuminga, much less exciting but whatever
I could be wrong, but if he was in fact a sign and trade then the Kings are hard capped at the first apron. So using the full MLE is not even possible. This also doesn’t even take into consideration that it’s damn near certain they won’t spend in to the tax.
Now, should they somehow cut a bunch of salary, then that full MLE may come into play
I’ll add, the pessimist in me could see how cheap ass teams would intentionally commit a sign and trade so they can simply say, “Sorry, we actually can’t spend anymore, we are hard capped.”
Couldn’t they just rework the timing so that S&T is done last in the order of transactions? Considering a MLE offer is made and accepted.
At least we’re getting some good young defensive players.
Schroder – LaVine – Kuminga – Murray – Domas
Westbrook – Ellis – Clifford – Jones – Raynaud/Eubanks
I don’t know what they’ll do with DDR
That’s Perry’s next step,
Well we will be able to score a lot.. and I think this will stunt Keegan Offensively..I would rather have a low usage defensive minded stretch at 3/4..
Understood, but I just wouldn’t get too caught up on the roster today. Perry has been GM for about 3 months. The roster will look very different by both the end of the season and the start of next season.
If we want to look at more of the imagined future, the team (assuming JK for Monk. Carter, Saric, and two 2nds goes through):
PG: Schroder (stopgap, but here for 2 years)
SG: Ellis, Nique
SF: Keegan
PF: Kuminga (if the trade happens)
C: Sabonis (maybe), Rayuad
Definite trade fodder: DDR, LaVine
Perry’s challenge is getting rid of the fodder while hopefully getting back some value and not having to attach assets to ditch the contracts.
And while listed above, Sabonis and Schroder likely go for the right price too.
Lineup above is young and has some holes, but at least starts to look like a younger base that could take off with a star player.
Biggest hole without a real young player is PG. We should try to either trade for one or prioritize one in the draft next season if there’s a good one left in the current draft Tier when we are on the clock (obviously still draft BPA).
Very fair.. I suspect DDR will be the person we move.. i dont think LaVine is moveable but I think he can be worked with as long as we have some decent defenders.. in a perfect world we would get rid of LaVine and DDR.. i agree that Kuminga s not a bad gamble if we can get him. I would rather have a true stretch four as long as we have Sabonis.. as much as I love Sabonis I think that he would have to be a player to be moved if we kept LaVine and land Kuminga.. need a center that can defend and be a rim runner type. If you have Murray, LaVine, Kuminga and hopefully get a better PG in the next year..
Won’t stunt Keegan. Kuminga a different player. Works inside where Keegan, at the 3 where he belongs shoots the 3. With this lineup I see LaVine first and Keegan second and Kuminga third.
So Schroder and Kuminga in.
Monk, DC and two second rounders out.
If Kuminga levels-up, I’d call this a win.
Be nice if the Warriors would just take DeRozan. Open a path for Keegan and Kuminga to be more of a focus offensively.
Saric also out.
Yes – I can be a tinge excited about that from a fan perspective. Some young guys who potentially can develop. A future hall of famer who never short changes you with his effort.
I would move Keegan back to the 3 and Kuminga to the 4. Keegan shoots the 3 and Kuminga works the basket.
I also like the defense of Schoder, Ellis and Murray. Through in a Clifford once in a while.
Kuminga also isn’t the worst defender. Has some really good moments, although a bit inconsistent.
But if he gets a true starting role and locks in, you can start to see the makings of a true modern defense with long, decently athletic, switchable players.
Is Kuminga the type of player the Kings need? He seems like a selfish player that doesn’t play defense.
I am not really a Kuminga believer, but he’s the type of young player with possible unfulfilled potential that the Kings should take a flyer on, rather than expensive vets past their prime (Schroder, Saric, Westbrook, DDR, LaVine).
Absolutely you take a flyer on Kuminga if you can without overpaying for it. 23 years old with his skill set, it’s a no brainer. No guarantees it works out but when you’re in the Kings position, that’s exactly the right type of move.
Exactly.
And this is the type of player (long, athletic, maybe just needs a change of scenery) type of player that Monte would never take a flyer on. I at least consider this a good sign that Perry knows you need long and athletic to win in this league, not undersized and unathletic like Monte seemed to covet.
100% this. There is basically three uses of the money we would spend on Kuminga:
1 – Sign Kuminga (or trade for and extend another young player)
2 – Sign a couple of older veterans to push for the play-in like Westbrook.
3 – Make a trade with a good team where we take on a bad contract in exchange for a mid to late first round pick.
I think the whole sub hates number 2. And I have a hard time seeing us drafting a prospect in the 20s next season who would have as attractive of a risk-reward profile as Kuminga.
We could quibble that we would like Perry to get a better, more promising young player with the same assets, but that might not be possible. We could potentially pull and OKC and get decent veterans in scenario 3 that we rehab and swing for picks in a virtuous cycle. But that’s rare and would likely require a full commitment to tanking that realistically isn’t going to happen.
Basically, for all of Kuminga’s faults, I 100% agree with you, this is at least the type of gamble we should be taking.
And thank the CBA, because 15 years ago this would have to be a 7 year deal that could handicap us for awhile. But now it’s 4 years and if Kuminga is another one dimensional scorer, we can jettison him right as we are hopefully ascending with other young players.
I agree with you about Kuminga, but given that if the deal goes through, and Saric is part of it, it’ll require seeing things as a whole rather than simple pieces.
Decent odds that DeRozan can be moved, he has a bankable skill, creating shots and getting buckets with consistency. Someone will be looking for that, especially as the trade deadline creeps up.
Lavine is going to be a tough sell on his deal, but if a team with a legit shot to contend loses a leading scorer, something could come of it.
And as I understand it, Schroder will be absorbed into the Huerter trade exception which keeps the full MLE available. I’d like to have got him for less, but he’ll be fine running point until a more long-term solution arrives. If I thought the Kings had a legit chance to make a run this season, I might be a bit pessimistic, but as far as I’m concerned, Sacramento can lose sixty games. At this moment, I’d guess that they’ll win something like thirty-five, and my hope is that if the record is bleak when January gets here that Perry can convince the brain trust to steer into the skid toward an unrepentant tank.
Maybe he just wants to be more of a contributor on a team that values him. Time will tell. If this goes thru I like the trades. One less SG and a power forward we have needed for a long time. I’ll take that. Also I think Clifford will replace Monk sooner than later. And he plays defense. Next up DDR. Work out something for Naji Marshall or Cam Whitmore. Works for me.
ChatGPT has entered ..I liked Barnes and Keegan together but I think Barnes was lower usage than Kuminga Barnes usage in 22/23 was 17% and dropped to 15.7%
How would Kuminga fit on the Kings (Sabonis–Murray–LaVine–Schroeder)?
Projected Kings lineup you proposed
Strengths in this setup:
✅ Doesn’t need to be a primary playmaker — Sabonis and Schroeder handle that.
✅ Can attack against weaker defenders and exploit his athleticism in transition.
✅ Keegan and Schroeder can space for him while Sabonis draws attention inside.
✅ His cutting and offensive rebounding would complement Sabonis very well.
Concerns:
???? Shooting: playing Kuminga + Sabonis + Schroeder together risks poor spacing.
???? LaVine already soaks up a lot of possessions, so Kuminga would need to lower his USG to fit.
???? Defensive attention: with LaVine and Sabonis on the floor, defenses may help off Kuminga more, exposing his shaky jumper.
???? Redundant skillset with Keegan: both are combo forwards, though Keegan spaces better.
Verdict:
Kuminga could thrive if he embraces a low‑usage, slasher/defender role on this Kings team. But as currently constructed, that lineup would be tight on spacing unless Kuminga improves his catch‑and‑shoot 3. He’d likely need to scale his usage back to 18–20% and focus on energy plays, cutting, and secondary scoring, letting LaVine, Sabonis, and Keegan handle the bulk of touches.
If he insists on being a high‑usage scorer, this is not an ideal fit. If he adapts to a complementary role, the Kings’ playmaking and pace could unlock his athletic tools.
Also I asked if there was any data to suggest he could be more efficient at lower usage around 16-17%
What it means for a 16–17% usage
We don’t have direct split data for exactly 16–17% usage, but the 2022–23 season gives strong indication:
✅ Bottom line
Yes, Kuminga could absolutely remain effective at reduced usage (16–17%) — likely becoming more efficient and balanced offensively, keeping his playmaking, and leaning into his strengths (cutting, finishing, defense). The challenge will be adapting his mindset from high-usage scorer to complementary piece: focusing on off-ball movement, timing, spacing, and intelligent finishing.
Unfortunately Johnathan kuminga has no plans to reduce his usage. Quite opposite actually. He recently had an interview with anthony slater where he said as much. He wants out of GS so he can be the man. That’s what we’re signing up for. High usage kuminga [insert vomit emoji]
Wow! that ChapGPT analysis is amazing.
Can they get a deal done? We’ve mentioned Scott Perry a lot lately but we’ve left out his assistant in the Front Office – BJ Armstrong who was, most recently an agent.
Does this make any of you more or less confident a deal can be done?
As for opinions – we’ve all been worried that the Kings will be bringing back the same roster. The addition of Jonathan Kuminga (Kingminga? KuKinga?) is exactly what many have pined for – a young athletic big. He wants to high usage? Good. That means he wants to play, he wants to produce, he wants to show whatever greatness he has – I like that! As much as I adore Keegan (he is currently the most likable King draft pick – just like when we fawned over Ty Haliburton) he has shown to be a complacent, let it come to me type player (oddly, he starts games aggressively and then fades into the background).
Do I expect greatness from Kuminga? No, I don’t – only because the Steve Kerr Warriors seem to make everyone look so good – Jordan Bell, Trayce Jackson-Davis, Quentin Post – and Kuminga comes in and has an impact, but they pull him and don’t rely on him – he’s got a sort of Keon Ellis/Mike Brown leash, IMO.
The addition of Kuminga would be a new wrinkle for this team and makes them younger and more athletic. I like it!
Oh Kuminga.
I would have NEVER guessed we’d be trying to trade for another Golden State Warrior…
Very sneaky, Vivek.
Very sneaky Perry. Do you think Monty would have done this?
Question? Do you think Clifford can backup Schorder. He has played point guard before. Gives him more chances to play if ready.
Monte would never even consider this type of move. He’s probably in the Clipper’s FO right now trying to convince Frank to get in on this sign and trade and trade for DC.
I hope that we get the chance to take a flyer on Kuminga. He’s got all of the tools, hopefully an opportunity to get consistent minutes will be the thing that brings everything together.
Monk will be missed, but if he’s the primary cost to get this done, I run with it.
Blake, thank you. Awesome write up.
SportsJunkie, another excellent job on your draft report, much appreciated.
Is Keegan Murray not considered a wing?
As an Aztec fan, I’ve seen a lot of Nique. He is a competitor and a dog. The Aztecs locked him up in the first game this past season, but he came back and torched us in the more critical second game. That first game was a little concerning. The Aztecs’ length bothered him, but he figured it out in the second.
thanks for the input KFK
Okay DDR next. Would you trade DDR for Wiggins, Wig would backup both Keegan and Kuminga. Plays defense. Not the scorer DDR is but fits the Kings concept better. Still fairly young not an old player like DDR. Ot would you rather go after someone like a Cam Whitmore or Naji Marshall. Both fit the King’s timeline. If not give me some other options.
Oh yes it was a sign & trade! If only I could be as optimistic as Jack about offloading DeRozan being Perry’s next move. GS wants to move Kuminga because he overlaps with Jimmy. He obviously overlaps with both DDR and Murray. And remember those bygone days when we here at TKH mentally kicked the tires on people like Stewart and Collins because Sabonis wasn’t enough of a rim protector and we had Murray as an undersized 4? Kuminga is both an intriguing prospect and a poor fit without a lot more moves. Let’s hope Perry has those moves in him.
Another SG. NEAT!
Badge Legend