fbpx
Feb. 28, 6:00 PM
SAC @ DEN
Mar. 01, 5:00 PM
SAC @ MIN
Mar. 04, 7:00 PM
CHI @ SAC
Mar. 06, 7:30 PM
SAC @ LAL
Mar. 07, 7:00 PM
SAN @ SAC
Mar. 10, 3:00 PM
HOU @ SAC
Mar. 12, 7:00 PM
MIL @ SAC
Mar. 13, 7:00 PM
LAL @ SAC
Mar. 16, 7:00 PM
NYK @ SAC

ESPN Places Kings At No. 27 In ‘Future Power Rankings’

By | 0 Comments | Feb 20, 2019

Chad Ford and John Hollinger have the latest Future Power Rankings over at ESPN.com. The idea is to handicap teams for the three seasons following the current/upcoming season, so this set address how the Kings will perform in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. I like both writers quite a bit, but there's always a quibble when national writers look at the lesser teams in detail. (I should know, because as someone who writes on national NBA topics, I often struggle to catch up on the machinations of the teams we don't write about frequently. Sorry, Milwaukee.)

The first step to viewing any Future Power Rankings when you're a Kings fan is to skip to the "Nos. 26-30" page. Huzzah! It worked. The Kings landed at No. 27, as the headline above likely tipped you off to. Sacramento ranked dead last in management (unsurprising), No. 21 in money (a stunner, frankly), No. 19 in players (about right, maybe high), No. 27 in market (as it stands now? sure … the potential is much higher) and No. 7 in future draft picks (woo! the Hickson Affair didn't kill us here). We're just behind the Orlando Magic (welp) and ahead of the Washington Wizards (YEAH).

Here's the rosey bit.

Agree? Disagree?

Patreon Membership
* indicates required


To prevent spam, our system flags comments that include too many hyperlinks. If you would like to share a comment with multiple links, make sure you email [email protected] for it to be approved.

0 Comments

Badge Legend

Patreon Supporter Patreon Supporter   Registered On Day 1 Registered On Day 1   Published Post Published Post  Published Post Nostradumbass
Comment Up Votes 200 Up Votes   Comment Up Votes 500 Up Votes    1,000 Up Votes    3,000+ Up Votes

Comments 50 Comments   Comments 100 Comments    250 Comments    500 Comments    1000+ Comments