Welcome to Part Two of the Scott Perry Pre-Season Evaluation.
It’s time to turn our attention to our guy, Scott Perry—like him or not—and his first draft as the general manager of the Sacramento Kings. Before we dive in, though, I’d suggest checking out the last installment of the Contrarian Corner in this breakdown of the Schroder signing, if you haven’t already.
Now, let’s dive into what I believe was the single most important element of Scott Perry’s tenure as GM thus far: his vision and execution during the 2025 NBA Draft.
The Draft: Crafty Moves and Big Payoffs
Heading into the draft, the Kings didn’t have a first-round pick. Thanks to the 2022 Kevin Huerter trade, their protected pick was conveyed to the Atlanta Hawks as a top-12 selection in 2025. With no extra picks in hand, Perry and the front office had to get crafty. Enter the draft-night trade with the Oklahoma City Thunder.
The Kings sent the 2027 Spurs first-rounder (acquired in the De’Aaron Fox trade) to OKC. That pick is top-16 protected, meaning if the Spurs make the playoffs in 2027, it conveys as a late first-rounder. If not, it becomes two second-round picks. Essentially, it’s a low-risk move. In return, the Kings snagged the 24th pick in this year’s draft and selected Nique Clifford.
Nique Clifford, who, by all accounts, is a certified baller and shot caller.
He’s a big-time scorer who averaged 19 points, 10 rebounds, and over 4 assists in his final college season. He also took on more ball-handling duties while maintaining his reputation as a 3-and-D asset. While he doesn’t have the ideal size (6’6”) to play at small forward or power forward, he’s versatile enough to play the 1, 2, or 3. He can handle the ball, create, spot up, cut, and defend at a high level.
Clifford’s Summer League performance was nothing short of breathtaking. He earned All-Summer League First Team honors with averages of 15 points, 6 rebounds, 4 assists, and a steal per game on 49% shooting from the field and a stellar 46% from three. He’s already received universal praise from outlets like ESPN, Sports Illustrated, The Ringer, and Rookie Wire. Heading into the draft, he was ranked 20th on ESPN’s Big Board, 17th by The Ringer, and 19th by Yahoo. This pick isn’t even a Contrarian Corner hot take—everyone’s high on Clifford, and for good reason.
The Kings also made a stellar second-round pick at 42, selecting Maxime Raynaud. This was great value, as he was ranked 15th by Yahoo, 28th by The Ringer, and 26th by ESPN. Raynaud averaged 20 points, 11 rebounds, and nearly 1.5 blocks per game at Stanford in his fourth year. He’s a vocal leader, methodical, and cerebral—everything you want in a future big. He also says all the right things, wants to sit under the Domantas Sabonis learning tree.
Clearing the Decks: The Jonas Valančiūnas Trade
Now, let’s fire up the Contrarian Corner engine and take the ol’ ‘86 Bronco out of the garage. This summer, the Kings traded Jonas Valančiūnas straight up for Dario Šarić. The outrage from fans was immediate and intense. It reminded me of the time young Zack watched Homer Simpson serve as country music star Lurleen Lumpkin’s manager. She was clearly infatuated with Homer, and who could blame her? But when she made her move and planted a smooch on Homie, he shut it down—though not without a moment of brief contemplation.
Simpsons analogies aside, I needed time to process the JV trade. The Kings also signed Drew Eubanks, a guy who looks like he could teach middle school science. At first, it seemed like a head-scratcher. But then I thought about Raynaud. Perry is clearly clearing the decks to give him a real shot at earning minutes this season, potentially as the backup center, very soon. As the homies, Deuce and Mo pointed out in their day 3 training camp recap, both Eubanks and Maxi fit the up-tempo, high-octane style that Doug Christie and the coaching staff are emphasizing; JV not so much.
The Dario Šarić Experiment
Here’s where the Contrarian Corner alarms start blaring, and the McGruber meltdown sequence begins. Let’s talk about Dario Šarić. On the surface, it looks like the Kings dumped Jonas Valančiūnas—whom they traded two second-rounders for earlier this year—just to save $15 million. But what if Šarić can still play?
Not so long ago during his stint with the Golden State Warriors, he averaged 8 points, 4 rebounds, and 2 assists in 17 minutes per game on solid shooting splits: 47% from the field and 38% from three. That performance earned him the taxpayer mid-level exception with Denver to begin with last season. Unfortunately, he barely got any opportunities with the Nuggets, a team plagued by well documented internal turmoil.
So, what do we think? Could Šarić thrive with a fresh start? Could he play spot minutes at the 4 and 5, stretch the floor, move the ball, and maybe bring back the nickname “Super Dario” – all while flopping his hair around dropping dimes?
And if it works out, we’ll all look back and laugh at the McGruber-style panic alarms we set off when this trade first went down. Sometimes, you just have to trust the vision.
Final Thoughts
Between the draft moves, cost savings, and potential stylistic fit, Scott Perry’s offseason required vision and guts. Until next time, this has been Contrarian Corner.




Like Perry’s draft moves as Clifford and Raynaud seem solid . My thought about pre draft rankings is that the only rankings that mean much is where they were drafted . So, the actual NBA rankings had Clifford at 24 and Raynaud at 42. Also, if they were not selected by the Kings they would have been lower . Just sayin
Which is exactly why Georgios Papagiannis went #13
Scott Perry’s draft masterclass? That’s bold.
I think I’ll wait until they’ve played some actual regular season minutes before I come to any conclusions on the rookies. Hope they are good enough to be in the rotation consistently this season.
Yeah, I was impressed with Nique in summer league, but I had to remind myself… it’s summer league. He’s also a 5th year senior who will be 24 in February. My hope is he can notch out a rotation role at some point, but expectations are tempered
The success of the draft will likely be determined in a couple seasons. I think Nique and Max were solid picks, but they haven’t played a single NBA game yet.
As for the rest of the offseason…LaRavia and J-Val are better than Saric and Eubanks. If this roster had LaRavia, I would feel much more confident that the wing/forward spot would be better.
J-Val gave the team some legit size, even though he is a bit more slow footed at his age/size.
I do agree that it took vision and guts to make a potentially bonehead trade for Saric and signing a career backup/bench player to play as the primary backup to Domas for a team that says they want to compete and try to get in the playoffs.
Clifford and Raynaud are, to me, the classic examples of players that could thrive in specific roles on good teams, but will wind up being square pegged into round holes on the Kings. I call this the Jason Thompson syndrome, but the list of these types of Kings players is very, very long. Ultimately, there is a a very real chance that these players disappoint not for who they are, but for who they are not. Case in point: the thought that Clifford can fill in at the three, instead of having a viable, NBA proven player available and ready. Is it possible? Sure. Probable? Nope.
Fill in this season and be a positive impact? I think that is a lot to ask of any rookie.
I am interested to see how they envision Maxime being effective. Is he more of a stretch 5, PF, low post C that is a glue/connecting passer? 2nd rounders tend not to pan out too often.
HERE is link to some very dated NBA draft pick expected performance.
THIS is also a good read on success of 2nd round picks
Basically, 2nd round picks have a low percentage of becoming NBA role players. Pick #42 (Maxime) has about a 5% chance of becoming a solid player and 15% chance of being a role player. Of course there are always outliers (Isaiah Thomas for example) but If Maxime can even become a role player, it would be a win.
“Losing” LaRavia falls under Monte’s regime, not Perry’s. The constraints on what the Kings could offer him were in place before Monte traded for him.
Yeah, I know Monte traded for LaRavia and had the contract restraints. I just wanted Perry to convince him to stay, somehow.
I think there has been some confusion on the San Antoion pick:
Here are the details of the pick:
The way I read that is if the Spurs miss the playoffs (pick fall 1-16) the Kings get the pick, BUT they will have to give two of their 2nd round picks to OKC as compensation. If, however the Spurs make the playoffs (pick falls 17-30), OKC gets the pick and the Kings get NOTHING.
In the end OKC will get something, either a Spurs late first or two 2nd rounds from Sac. That was their compensation in giving up the #24 that would become Nique. The Kings can only get a lottery pick from the Spurs, but it will cost them two second rounders. There are no 2nd rounders coming to Sac.
My thinking is OKC made this trade because they feel the Spurs will be a playoff team by 2027. Very low risk for them, as it would just be a swap of late round picks. The Kings, however, basically valued Nique more than an unprotected 2027 Spurs pick.
Time will tell.
Good analysis. Glad to see some daily writing to keep us fans energized as thus season begins.
My biggest concern was the failure to bring back Jake LaRavia. He was a superb fit as the backup or starting 3.
The Kings were limited by CBA rules. Since the Grizzlies had declined his option, they could only offer him a new first year salary up to the amount of that declined option year, and not a dollar more. When the Kings acquired LaRavia via trade, that limitation came with him. The Lakers offered more than the Kings were allowed to pay under the CBA rules.
It sucked losing LaRavia, but I don’t blame the front office for it.
Why didn’t Perry use someone like Anh Phoong to make a no-show contract to pay him more? Are the Kings stoopid??
/sarcasm btw
Umm… no. He’s Vivek’s yes-man, at least until he’s unceremoniously dumped away like his multitude of predecessors.
Thanks Zack for the contrarian, positive analysis of the season’s forecast and recent moves.
I fear the loss of Valanciunas will not be offset by the D & D acquisitions (Dario and Drew). Jonas, by sheer size and his superior skills is often at the level of a starting level, 5. You can’t run if you don’t rebound and that was an area he excelled. JV can rebound and trigger the break, he just can’t finish. He will really shine with the Nuggets who now have the best back up in the League, IMO (is Steven Adams better or just different, Brook Lopez is now a back up) to go with the best big man in future HoF-er Nikola Jokic.
Mobility is a less appreciated part of Domas’ game, again IMO. I can’t think of another rebounding big who runs (and often leads) the transition game better than Sabonis. Many point to Domantas as an undersized 5, yet he uses lesser size by being faster than Jokic, Embiid, Zubac, Kessler, Rudy Gobert, and AD in the West. The more mobile bigs are in the East (Mobley, Jarrett Allen in Cleveland, Bam in Miami, Jalen Duran in Detroit, KAT in NY)
Please, keep contributing Zack.
OT:
Sometimes Kings pregame/halftime guest Chelsea Grey looked good over the weekend. I love her energy on the court.
And can we Sign A’ja Wilson to a camp invite? She’s a 6′-4″ center so she’ll fit right in on our all guard team.
I’m kind of digging this. Because while none of us have any hope for this team. It’s nice pretending someone does.
Badge Legend