fbpx

Kings 92, Spurs 108: Spurs strangle Kings

The Spurs are a great defensive team and the Kings are a deceptively bad offense. There wasn't much suspense at what was going to happen
By | 0 Comments | Mar 6, 2019

But here's a secret that not even some of the nerdiest of stat nerds know: even Offensive Rating and Defensive Rating don't do a great job at "adjusting" for pace. Fast break possessions are inherently more efficient than half court possessions and a high number of those kinds of possessions will naturally skew the statistic upward. Basically, the offensive rating stat is still heavily influenced by pace and a rather poor proxy for how good a team's halfcourt offense is.

Meanwhile, on the other end, the Spurs danced around the Kings defense and got good looks on a fairly consistent basis. I don't have any stats to back this up, but from my observation when the Kings stayed home on their men, the defense was solid; when they fell into their zone, they were eviscerated. The Spurs shot 51.8% overall from the field and 42.1% from three, and with how open most of those shots were the Kings should count their lucky stars that it wasn't worse.

Not ideal, but again if the Spurs weren't uncharacteristically off from midrange it would have been much worse.

Random Observations

Tweet of the Night

Patreon Membership
* indicates required


To prevent spam, our system flags comments that include too many hyperlinks. If you would like to share a comment with multiple links, make sure you email [email protected] for it to be approved.

0 Comments

Badge Legend

Patreon Supporter Patreon Supporter   Registered On Day 1 Registered On Day 1   Published Post Published Post  Published Post Nostradumbass
Comment Up Votes 200 Up Votes   Comment Up Votes 500 Up Votes    1,000 Up Votes    3,000+ Up Votes

Comments 50 Comments   Comments 100 Comments    250 Comments    500 Comments    1000+ Comments