fbpx

Here’s why the Kings shouldn’t trade for Jahlil Okafor

An obscure CBA rule makes Okafor a bad gamble
By | 0 Comments | Nov 28, 2017

Recent reports indicate that the Philadelphia 76ers are willing to trade out-of-favor center Jahlil Okafor for a second round pick. Okafor has essentially been buried on Philly’s bench, but the former number three overall pick still has potential. The seemingly low asking price seems appealing, and Okafor is young enough that he seems like a potential boost to the Sacramento Kings front court. Naturally, some Kings fans are interested.

However, there’s an obscure CBA rule that makes that trade a terrible idea.

Because of a CBA rule, if the Kings trade for Okafor they would be limited to a 1 year, $6.3 million dollar offer this summer. That’s the amount of the option that Philadelphia declined. But while the Kings would be limited, other suitors would not. Okafor will be an unrestricted free agent.

What Philadelphia did by declining Okafor’s option is make him essentially untradeable. No team should give up an asset for less than a season of Okafor. If Okafor does nothing, you’ve lost an asset for a player who doesn’t help you. If Okafor thrives, you’ll be hamstrung in your ability to re-sign him.

Philly seems hell bent on waiting as long as possible before agreeing to a buyout with Okafor. At that point he’ll be a free agent, and whoever signs him can use their cap space to retain Okafor this next summer.

It’s an idea that looks good on paper, but the fine print makes this a deal the Kings should steer clear of.

Patreon Membership
* indicates required


To prevent spam, our system flags comments that include too many hyperlinks. If you would like to share a comment with multiple links, make sure you email [email protected] for it to be approved.

0 Comments

Badge Legend

Patreon Supporter Patreon Supporter   Registered On Day 1 Registered On Day 1   Published Post Published Post  Published Post Nostradumbass
Comment Up Votes 200 Up Votes   Comment Up Votes 500 Up Votes    1,000 Up Votes    3,000+ Up Votes

Comments 50 Comments   Comments 100 Comments    250 Comments    500 Comments    1000+ Comments