fbpx

2022 NBA Draft Profile: Paolo Banchero

Paolo Banchero has the most versatile offensive package in the draft class, but does he fit in Sacramento?
By | 140 Comments | Jun 14, 2022

Mar 26, 2022; San Francisco, CA, USA; Duke Blue Devils forward Paolo Banchero (5) reacts after a play against the Arkansas Razorbacks during the first half in the finals of the West regional of the men's college basketball NCAA Tournament at Chase Center. Mandatory Credit: Kelley L Cox-USA TODAY Sports

NBA Position: Big

General Info: 19-year-old Freshman, played at Duke University. From Seattle, Washington. Son of former Monarch player Rhonda Banchero.

Measurables: 6’10, 250 lbs, 7’1 wingspan.

2021-22 Season Statistics: 17.2 PPG, 7.8 RPG, 3.2 APG, 1.1 SPG, 0.9 BPG, 2.40.6 TPG (39 games played, 33.0 minutes a contest), 47.8% FG, 33.8% 3P, 72.9% FT

All hyperlinks in this profile are video clips showcasing the skills discussed.

From the moment he stepped on the court against Kentucky until the Final Four loss against North Carolina, Duke big man Paolo Banchero was the leading scorer and best player on the most scrutinized team in college basketball. While Head Coach Mike Krzyzewski’s retirement tour sucked up so much of the media attention around the Blue Devils, Banchero’s offensive dominance was the real story, and he got better and better as the season went along. While he’s seemingly become a draft afterthought behind projected top two picks Jabari Smith Jr. and Chet Holmgren, Banchero’s offensive versatility, playmaking ability, and physical tools give him a real chance to be the best player in the 2022 NBA Draft class.

Banchero has an incredible combination of strength, size, force, balance, and skill. He’s much faster and more coordinated with the ball in his hands than dudes at his size should be. It’ll take him time to adjust to NBA speed and size, but he’ll be a nightmare matchup for many bigs from the get-go, and will almost certainly be an even tougher matchup as his initiation skills improve and he gets into his prime. For a big man to have his level of coordination, footwork, and live dribble ability at 19 years old is extremely impressive. Indeed, Banchero is the best bet in the class to be both a true primary playmaker and team-leading scorer in the NBA, and he’s the only player in the top 4 that I’m confident could run an offense early in their careers.

Banchero’s footwork, patience, and ability to score through defenders offers him a variety of ways to score in the post. And when he’s on the perimeter, Paolo makes defenders pick their poison. He’s such a powerful driver that he can be very hard to stop when moving downhill, and he can burst past guys and finish with power or finesse. He shot 58.1% at the basket in non-post-up plays in the half court (69th percentile in the country) despite drawing nearly every defensive eye on the court.

And if defenders take away driving lanes, he’s a deadly pull-up assassin. His mid-range pull-up is straight gold, and even if it looks a little herky jerky at times, I believe it’ll give him a go-to shot from Day 1. He shot 47.5% on all mid-range jumpshots (88th percentile), and 37.5% on all off-the-dribble shots (54th percentile). His dribble-to-pullup game often looks like a guard with an extended career of doing this, not a 19 year old sitting at 6’10 and 250 lbs. Between his post-game, driving ability, and pull-up shot, Banchero has a level of versatility to his scoring game that Jabari Smith Jr., Chet Holmgren, and Jaden Ivey currently lack.

The biggest concern for Banchero’s offense is his three point shot, where he shot 33.8% on the season. For a player who really needs the deep shot to optimize the rest of his game, it’s fair to worry about his ugly misses, or the many times he hesitates on a good look and blows any rhythm. His free throw success of 73% (which fluctuated throughout the year) isn’t the most promising number either. That said, I believe in his mechanics, especially when he doesn’t hesitate, and I see no reason that he can’t pull his deadly mid-range shot out to the NBA three point line. He improved later in the season and shot 41.4% from three in March on 3.2 attempts per contest. But his shot is his biggest offensive swing skill, one that will likely set or raise his ceiling in the NBA.

But while Banchero’s scoring talents are all excellent, his passing ability might be his greatest skill. Aside from Cade Cunningham, I struggle to think of any other tall prospects I’ve scouted with his level of playmaking and court vision. He averaged 3.2 assists per game in the season, and 3.8 per game in their final 18 contests. Duke was a very good passing squad this year; Wendell More led Duke in assists, and Jeremy Roach was also a strong tertiary playmaker, but Paolo demanded so much attention on defense, and it was his playmaking that really stirred the drink for the Blue Devils.

He can read defenses well, sees where double teams are coming from, and can throw fireball passes. His drive-and-pass game was a huge part of punishing doubles and keeping opponents honest. And given his live dribble ability and speed in the open court, he’s as dynamic a rebound-and-go threat as you could possibly ask for. Any team, even ones that already have initiators in place, should love to add a big guy with Paolo’s vision and playmaking joy.

Overall, Banchero is a massive threat with the ball in his hands. His decision making isn’t always stellar, especially against NBA-level defenders. He ends up with a decent amount of forced shots, but it was expected given his role. It may take him a good while to find the right balance between looking for his shot and sharing the ball, especially if he ends up on a team where he’s not the primary offensive option. But his level of self-confidence, even if it leads to too many mistakes, also leads to smart players developing new offensive skills.

I’d love to see Paolo get time as a small ball 5 early in his career, as it may be his best position in the long run. While it may exacerbate some of his defensive issues, his quickness and explosiveness will be even more pronounced against many NBA centers. That said, he was so damn good when paired with Duke Center Mark Williams, a traditional rim protector/lob threat, and the two of them developed amazing chemistry over the course of the season. If you assume (as I do) that Paolo will continue to stretch his game out and become a better deep shooter, he’s so versatile on offense that it’s hard to envision a big man archetype who Banchero wouldn’t realistically fit with.

On defense, Paolo has some real question marks, both for effort and instincts. He had highlights where his innate physicality and awareness shows up and moments where he was clearly engaged on defense. But there were also plenty of lowlights; he’d take bad angles on drives, leave his man, or expect help defense that can’t come. If he’s switched onto a guard, for all his quickness at his size, those switches often end poorly. And most importantly, his effort at the next level needs to be better, which is a scary sentence for a Kings fan to type.

His rim protection upside is also a question mark. 0.9 blocks seems low for a dude with his size and tools. He had real flashes of rim protection that made me wonder why it wasn’t more consistent. Perhaps playing with Mark Williams, an ideal shot blocker (11.4% block rate, 4.8 per 40 minutes) limited Paolo’s opportunities and desire to be a rim protector, as some of his highlights came when Williams was out of the paint. Whatever the reason, he needs to be more engaged and aware at the rim in the NBA.

Of course, there are few one-and-done prospects who are high-motor, successful defenders, especially those who—like Banchero—had to run the offense. Anthony Edwards and Jayson Tatum were both poor defenders in college, and I don’t think it hyperbole to say that Ben Simmons was one of the lowest effort defenders I’ve scouted. Plenty of these one-and-done prospects, especially those with high-end physical toolsets, go on to become better/much better defenders at the next level. It’s fair to hope and expect that Banchero’s tools will give him an edge at the next level, especially if his offensive workload diminishes.

That said, the concerns for Banchero’s defense do go beyond effort, especially when compared to the other forwards at the top of the class. Chet Holmgren and Jabari Smith Jr. were more focused and successful defenders this year, which is the main reason I’d prefer either of them in Sacramento than Banchero. But their strengths and roles on defense—Holmgren as a rim protector, Smith Jr. as a jumbo perimeter defender—are also a lot more easy to define. Banchero doesn’t have as clear a niche or defensive position, unless he drastically improves as a rim protector and becomes the ideal small-ball 5. He’s nowhere near as concerning a defensive prospect as he-who-shall-not-be-named was (the guy all chuckleheads will bring up every time we talk about a Duke prospect), but Banchero has a lot to prove on that end of the court.

Banchero had some early season issues with cramps, which cost him playing time in high-profile matchups against Kentucky and Gonzaga. He was given IVs and an oxygenated fluid drink to help him avoid further cramps, and it seemed to help as the season went on. He played 35 minutes or more in 9 of Duke’s last 12 games. I’m not a doctor and won’t play one on the internet—it seems crazy to me that a player with Banchero’s size could lose “up to seven pounds per game” due to sweat, but I fully trust the NBA’s medical professionals to determine how to keep Banchero on the court.

Banchero’s fit in Sacramento is somewhat complicated by the fact that he and Domantas Sabonis overlap in a lot of their strengths and weaknesses. Neither is the most proven floor spacer, neither is a proven rim protector, and while both are high-level playmakers, they both will want to command a big part of the offense.

Since I’m optimistic about Banchero’s shooting projection, it’s easy for me to dismiss the offensive concerns; the Kings haven’t had the best success in recent years in drafting initiators and figuring out how to balance an offense between multiple players, but as long as Banchero’s shot improves, I’d love to see what Mike Brown and company could do with Fox, Banchero, and Sabonis on offense. Imagine a pick-and-roll between Paolo and Sabonis, which could let Banchero punish the bigger bigs who can’t stay in front of him or react to his pull-ups. Imagine Paolo cutting off the ball for Sabonis passes, or the Kings emphasizing Fox becoming more of a cutter and off-ball shooter with two super strong passing bigs on the court. The trio would likely struggle without consistent shooters around them, but the framework could be something special if paired with high-volume, low-usage bombers. And between Sabonis and Banchero, who led Duke with 7.8 boards per game this year, the Kings could have an exceptional rebounding duo without giving up speed for size.

The defensive concerns are much more complex for Sacramento, and the Kings would be gambling on Banchero’s toolset elevating his defense sooner rather than later. Banchero absolutely would need to become more focused on the defensive end to fit with Sabonis, and the team may never have the dynamic rim protector each player would love to be paired with. Taking Banchero would complicated McNair’s job immensely, forcing him to prioritize both shooters and defenders at pretty much every other position on the squad. But if Banchero is on the board at 4, in this armchair scout’s opinion, he’ll be far and away the best prospect left.

I wouldn’t be surprised if either Orlando or Oklahoma City shocks the world and snags Banchero. And while it seems strange that one of the top four prospects of Smith, Holmgren, Ivey, or Banchero has to go 4th (or lower), if Paolo Banchero is the one who slips to the Kings, Monte McNair shouldn’t hesitate to select him. There are certainly some fit concerns, especially on the defensive end—but at his talent level, concerns be damned. Don’t overthink Paolo Banchero.

Combined with Sabonis, Banchero would give the Sacramento Kings the best passing front court (and with Fox and Mitchell, perhaps best passing squad in total) since Vlade Divac and Chris Webber. And while I’m not a fan of big-name comparisons, Banchero has a ton of highlights showcasing a combination of power and skill that take me back two decades to pre-injury Webber. I see Paolo Banchero as the draft’s best chance to select the engine of an awesome NBA offense. His three level scoring, athletic gifts, and incredible passing instincts should be eagerly welcomed by any NBA team, including the talent-starved Sacramento Kings.

Patreon Membership
* indicates required


To prevent spam, our system flags comments that include too many hyperlinks. If you would like to share a comment with multiple links, make sure you email [email protected] for it to be approved.
Subscribe
Notify of
140 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hobby916
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 8:27 am

Excellent stuff Bryant, as usual.

I would be fine with the Kings selecting him at 4 if he were to be there. I think the team needs to find some type of difference in style than the rest of the league is currently aiming at. Maybe having two physical big men that can create offense for themselves and others is the way to go.

“Spacing” comes up a lot, which usually references having 3 point shooters. But could they also space the floor by having multiple dudes running off screens and cutting to the rim to be outlets for Sabonis and Paolo? Would that make the defense confused enough to keep them off balance? Maybe. Maybe not.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 3:37 pm
Reply to  Hobby916

I actually don’t think spacing would be an issue. I think we’ll see Sabonis shooting and hitting a decent amount of 3s this year (Say, 35% on 3 a game), and I think Banchero will shoot well.

Hobby916
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 7:29 am

I am not that worried either. I think Banchero will end up being around 35-36%, which is solid for a big man.

SPTSJUNKIE
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 8:32 am

Absolutely phenomenal job Bryant. I am personally bullish on Paolo.

I really feel like Paolo is the most “over thought” prospect in this class. He’s a very smart, highly skilled, 250 pound athletic three level scorer, who also is arguably the most impactful passer in this class (due to his ability to put pressure on the defense, there are arguably a couple of guards who are better pure passers).

And people keep talking like he’s closer to being a finished products with less upside (relative to his draft position). I keep seeing analysts and people on Twitter say some variation of “he might not be the best player, but he could win ROY” with a similar tone to how people might talk about a polished Senior who is ready to contribute, but lacks the upside of some of the top freshman. Paolo is 19 and still has a ton of room to continue to grow his skills.

Actually, my biggest concern with Paolo is that I am not 100% sure how he creates a sustainable competitive advantage from day 1. That is, he’s good at a lot – he can shoot, handle the ball, post, use his physicals advantages to sort of drive by bigs and bully smaller players. But he doesn’t have an elite “go-to” advantage yet. He’s not a physical beast like LeBron or Giannis (yet at least), he doesn’t have the elite feel of CP3 or Doncic, he isn’t an elite shooter like Steph or ball handler like Harden. I think he is so well rounded and skilled, he will get there and am betting on him, but he could struggle at times as a rookie without a true go-to advantage.

Interestingly, while I think people are right to question his defense, it does appear to be more effort than ability, which I think is fairly common with college stars who are the focal point of their team’s offense. Not that he’ll be a great defender, but when he’s locked in, he does slide well and plays pretty good defense.

And while he will not be a rim protector, he has the chance to provide the same congestion / friction inside of a player like Franz Wagner. Paolo averaged 1.1 blocks per 40 last season compared to 0.8 and 1.3 for Wagner. While certainly not elite, it would be a massive improvement for us over the 0.2-0.3 blocks per 40 Harrison Barnes has given us.

UpgradedToQuestionable
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 8:39 am

WoW! I enjoy these write ups. You are a Top Tier evaluator and writer. Thanks for these.

The Fit question rears it’s silly head – worrying about how a 19 year old possible All-Star fits with another All-Star in the frontcourt. Will he take the ball out of Sabonis’ hands? Silliness. Too many talented good decision makers – puh-leez. Thank you Bryant for addressing this concern.

One of the common cries is that Sacramento needs top level talent. Paolo has a high ceiling and a high floor. I like that the controversy is – if he drops to #4, and Murray is available – which one to you take? Some think that is an easy answer but we all know that there are no easy answers in this draft at #4. Maybe someone takes Murray in the Top 3. You just don’t know. 9 days and counting…

Kosta
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 9:19 am

As someone who would enjoy Murray being our pick at 4 (after the big 3 are taken)….if Paolo drops to 4, I think that is an easy answer—take Paolo!

SPTSJUNKIE
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 9:40 am
Reply to  Kosta

Agreed. He’s too talented. And I think he’d work well with our players even if it’s not a dream fit.

PlayoffModeT
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 9:59 am
Reply to  Kosta

Paolo is certainly intriguing. It would be a great problem to have with him and Sabonis.

If the top 3 go as planned, Kosta, I too would like to take Keegan at 4.

My crazy idea would be to offer HB and Holmes to Portland for 7 (and maybe Josh Hart) to take Dyson Daniels. In his interview with Mike Schmidt, Dyson said he is now 6’7 w/o shoes. I am just all in on his ability to be a winning player.

TheGrantNapear
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:32 am
Reply to  PlayoffModeT

I love that trade idea although I doubt Portland does.

UpgradedToQuestionable
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 10:37 am
Reply to  TheGrantNapear

To tie in with Rob Hessing’s question –

I don’t expect this 16 game improvement, playoff demanding push to have the Kings get younger. More like the opposite. Trading away experience and a starter – like Harrison Barnes, who is also at a position of need – to get a younger player who needs to be developed, like the intriguing Dyson Daniels, seem highly unlikely. It could happen, but I would expect Sacramento to get older before they get younger.

That’s my take, anyway.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:33 am
Reply to  PlayoffModeT

I like Daniels, but I don’t think he’s quite as good of a prospect as the guys available at #4 (esp. if 1 of the top 3 bigs falls).

PlayoffModeT
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:49 am
Reply to  richie88

Sorry, my comment was with the idea of keeping #4 (taking bpa) and acquiring #7. So getting younger, balanced, and potentially more talented with Murray and Daniels.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:53 am
Reply to  PlayoffModeT

Ah. I think they probably wouldn’t trade #7 for Barnes & Holmes.

andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 11:59 am
Reply to  PlayoffModeT

I told Schmidt the same thing, but it isn’t exactly true.

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 8:41 am

it seems crazy to me that a player with Banchero’s size could lose “up to seven pounds per game” due to sweat,

The Big Humidity.

UpgradedToQuestionable
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 9:11 am
Reply to  RobHessing

comment image
(required)

UpgradedToQuestionable
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 9:27 am

What do the other guys on the team do when he gets up from his seat? I would be all Ewwww, it’s all wet. I’m not sitting there.

But if Banchero is available at #4 – I’d like to think the choice is easy – draft him. No sweat.

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 9:42 am

He’s not the guy that you want to guard in rec. ball, that’s for sure.

SlamsonsRollerskates
Comments
Comments
June 14, 2022 10:39 am
Reply to  RobHessing

Ben Stiller in Along Came Polly comes to mind…

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 10:58 am

Meet Paolo!
comment image

Hobby916
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:22 am
Reply to  RobHessing

That’s why he can create so much space!

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 3:13 pm
Reply to  Hobby916

PB: Coach, is my shot wet or what?
K: My God you’re moist! That’s it – I’m out.
comment image

Kosta
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 5:32 pm
Reply to  RobHessing

Coach Kersweatsky

SPTSJUNKIE
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 9:20 am
Reply to  RobHessing

Based on Bryant’s write up, it might be more, The Big Humi-ity.

Kosta
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 9:21 am
Reply to  RobHessing

Imagine if Chet lost seven pounds per game due to sweat!

SPTSJUNKIE
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 10:02 am
Reply to  Kosta

It would be a weapon, he’d basically become invisible.

Daydreamer
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 10:18 am
Reply to  Kosta

😂

Gregoryl
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 11:06 am
Reply to  RobHessing

We call this “The Kenny Thomas Effect”.

HongKongKingsFan
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 8:55 am

If J. Smith drops to #4, I would be thrilled.

if Chet and Banchero dropped to #4, I would have a complicated feeling.

Mateen Cleaves
June 14, 2022 9:35 am

Dreamt we actually got him at #4 last night. When reality hit, it stung.

SlamsonsRollerskates
Comments
Comments
June 14, 2022 10:40 am

I think if Chet drops we’ll take him, if Paolo drops we’ll trade the pick. I’d be thrilled too if Smith dropped!

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 12:00 pm

It’d take a hell of a trade for me to be OK w/passing on Paolo.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:57 am

I don’t think Jabari will drop to #4. If Paolo or Chet falls to #4, I think they’ll be the BPA.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 3:39 pm
Reply to  richie88

Yep. If one of those 3 drop, take’em. If not, take Murray or Sharpe. Done.

LLcoolRay
Original Member
Comments
Original Member
Comments
June 14, 2022 9:15 am

Man. The thought of Paolo with a consistent outside shot is droolworthy. Like you pointed out, there are defensive concerns but if the Kings can get another pick and take Tari Eason/Dyson Daniels, we could have a really interesting lineup of Fox-Mitchell-Eason-Paolo-Sabonis

Of course the shooting would be questionable with upside, but you’d really be set on defense and have some really interesting looks on offense while still having a young team.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 3:17 pm
Reply to  LLcoolRay

I’m not at all concerned with his shot. He was much more of a ball-handler than guys like Chet and Smith. As such, a higher percentage of his 3s were pull-ups. Naturally, that’s going to skew his percentages. I believe I read somewhere that he shot 40+% on CnS 3s (or was it corner 3s?).

andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 9:19 am

Son of former Monarch player Rhonda Banchero.

I did not know that! This changes everything, he’s the Chosen One to lead Sacramento to a title.

Kosta
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 9:23 am
Reply to  andy_sims

Did you know that Jabari Smith Jr. is the son of former King Jabari Smith?

It’s true!

andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 9:47 am
Reply to  Kosta

I’ll be damned. Let’s take Smith, then.

Jman1949
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 12:48 pm
Reply to  andy_sims

comment image&ct=g

Kosta
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 9:25 am
Reply to  andy_sims

!!!
comment image

andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 10:08 am

There has been so much analysis and scenario-building around the order, and it’s been very educational for me, so thank you to Bryant, the other writers, and the commenters. And best of all, there is a really good chance that Sacramento is going to get itself a very good basketball player.

I do think that it would be funny if, after all of the hypothesizing, the order ends up being Holmgren, Smith, Banchero, then Ivey, which is what everyone’s boards looked like six months ago. Whichever of them is still on the board at four is about as easy of a decision as a GM is going to get.*

*Barring trades/nuclear war/snow flurries in Sacramento

TheGrantNapear
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:34 am
Reply to  andy_sims

Certainly an easy decision at 4 for most franchises, just not this one with Vivek lurking over the pick.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 12:57 pm
Reply to  andy_sims

If Jabari, Paolo & Chet are gone before #4, I’d call Murray the BPA. It wouldn’t be nearly as easy as the decision the FO screwed by taking Bagley for some inexplicable reason.

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 10:13 am

Semi-thread jack: What does everyone see the percentage at that the Kings keep the #4 pick vs. trading down or out of it? 75%?

UpgradedToQuestionable
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 10:32 am
Reply to  RobHessing

Last week I was convinced that Sacramento was trading up.
This week, the opposite (I’d say less than 10% Sac trades out of the first round, 25% they trade down.)
Next week….?

John Collins, Jerami Grant, Mo Bamba, Jonathan Issac, JayMichael Green, Malcolm Brodgon, Josh Hart, Christian Wood, Julius Randle – am I missing any of the names bandied about as trade fodder for Sacramento? I expect more possibilities over the next week – how much mirage, what holds water – it’s anyone’s guess. But it keeps us fans talking and I like that.

Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:43 am

JayMichael Greene was traded yesterday.

TheGrantNapear
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:35 am
Reply to  RobHessing

I’d say 75 percent as well. I think in general we’ll see a lot of trades during the draft, just not in the top 5 or so.

andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 10:36 am
Reply to  RobHessing

That’s tough. There is definitely a non-zero chance that a trade happens, but I’d guess that McNair’s price will be high, given that this may be a four-player draft. I don’t expect it, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility that Ivey goes at one or two.

If Holmgren goes first, OKC might be willing to swap, and then the question is, what does it cost? And if Sacramento trades back, what do we get? Or we jut take whomever is at four, because that guy is a really promising prospect. There are a lot of ways that this works out really well for Sacramento.

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:53 am
Reply to  andy_sims

History as a draft guide proves it’s never a 4 player draft . Even if it occurred zero chance it would be the first 4 .

scottymusprime
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:41 am
Reply to  RobHessing

Staying at 4 — 65%
Trading Out (scariest in my mind) — 15%
Trading Up — 15%
Trading down — 5%.

Trading down unless it really moves the needle just doesn’t seem to do it for Monte keeping his job. He’d have to Reeeeeeeeallly believe in Mike Brown, and even then…

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 1:20 pm
Reply to  scottymusprime

This seems about right to me (though the trading out % seems a bit high to me).

SlamsonsRollerskates
Comments
Comments
June 14, 2022 10:43 am
Reply to  RobHessing

I think it’s all based on who falls.

I personally think if Chet or Smith drops to us, 10% chance we trade the pick because we want one of those two guys. If Paolo falls, 90% chance we trade the pick.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 1:42 pm

While Paolo & Sabonis are a tough fit on defense, I think Paolo’s too talented to trade unless they get a great offer.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Reply to  richie88

Yeah, that better be one hell of a trade.

Gregoryl
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 11:10 am
Reply to  RobHessing

I was wondering, is this the time Monte is calling other GMs in prep for draft night asking “If ________ is available at #4, we are taking him. What would you give us for him”?

andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 12:08 pm
Reply to  Gregoryl

I’d be surprised if he wasn’t. I’d not be shocked of something was already in place with OKC if Smith is available at two. I think my preference is that if we do swap, it’s down in order to bring back a solid starter or better. I’m confident that the interest around the league in Ivey is higher than has been reported, and that McNair will have choices if the Boilermaker is there at four.

If Ivey goes higher, then whoever has dropped is also likely to be of interest to other teams, which could bring additional opportunities. Or we just keep our draftee because he’s going to be a great NBA player.

Adamsite
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
June 14, 2022 12:08 pm
Reply to  RobHessing

I could easily see the Kings taking the consensus BPA at #4 then sitting on him until much later in the first round and making a big trade that involves a proven vet and a late pick.

Just a hypothetical example: #4 (Ivey) and Terrance Davis for Tyler Herro and #27 (Jake LaRavia or EJ Liddell?).

andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 2:47 pm
Reply to  Adamsite

If the incoming player is the right one, I’d not object to something like that. Not at all!

RikSmits
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 10:31 am

There are a few players that I instinctively dislike (as players, not persons) in this draft without being able to coherently explain. Banchero is one of them.

scottymusprime
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:39 am
Reply to  RikSmits

I’m on this train as well. If for some reason the top 3 is some order of Smith, Chet and Sharpe, I want to trade out of the pick. I actually saw a trade floated by a Jazz friend of mine that I like where we end up with Donovan Mitchell:

Jazz get: Hayward (Cap damage) and Davion Mitchell +Picks (This year’s #4 and #13 and one or two more)
Kings get: Donovan Mitchell and Alexander-Walker (or Filler)
Hornets get: Harrison Barnes and cap filler.
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=27oye745

If that trade is on the table, I do it in a heartbeat unless Smith is there at #4. The thought of Fox, Sabonis, and Mitchell is too tantalizing to avoid.

andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 10:58 am
Reply to  scottymusprime

Seems like it would be cheaper to draft a player who doesn’t defend than to trade for Mitchell.

Mephariel
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:23 pm
Reply to  andy_sims

I agree. What is Kings fans’ obsession with Mitchell? Everyone of his flaws people say the same of Fox.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 15, 2022 7:15 am
Reply to  Mephariel

Kings fans’ obsession with Mitchell is that he’s an extremely good, still young player who has had a lot of NBA success in his short career that is supposedly somewhat available. Fans of a shitty team that lacks talent wanting a good young player is pretty standard.

And while I suppose you COULD say Mitchell’s “flaws” fall into the same category as Fox’s, they are to a different degree. While I do love a good hyperbole, the Mitchell defense talk is out of hand around here. He’s average to slightly below. Fox is another tier or two below him. And, of course, Donovan is better across the board on the offensive end.

Mephariel
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:23 pm
Reply to  scottymusprime

Who is going to defend on that team? Why not just draft Ivey then?

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 15, 2022 7:20 am
Reply to  Mephariel

Because Ivey, after a few years of development, if everything goes just right, MIGHT become as impactful as Mitchell. Maybe.

SPTSJUNKIE
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 11:16 am
Reply to  RikSmits

Do you have any gut feeling on why that is?

Adamsite
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
June 14, 2022 11:54 am
Reply to  RikSmits

Same. I get Aaron Gordon vibes, but with worse defense. That’s not a bad thing, but it would mean he’s not worthy of the #4 pick in this draft.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 8:35 pm
Reply to  Adamsite

I think he’ll be a lot better than Gordon on offense.

Adamsite
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Nostradumbass 14
June 14, 2022 9:19 pm
Reply to  richie88

But a lot worse on defense? Do the Kings need a better offensive player or a better defensive player?

Mephariel
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:26 pm
Reply to  Adamsite

Both. We are not in the position to worry about defense like we are winning a championship with one more piece. If Paolo has great offense and mediocre defense, what is the worst that can happen? Trade him and get something back. There will always be a team that wants a scorer.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 1:27 am
Reply to  Adamsite

The Kings need talent & I think Paolo is the 2nd most talented prospect in the draft. I worry about the perimeter defense of a Sabonis/Paolo combo, but I think they’d be fine in terms of post defense & a potent offensive combo.

TheGrantNapear
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:35 am

Paolo = Billy Owens 2.0? 🤔

Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:41 am
Reply to  TheGrantNapear

Wow.
Hot take, Grant. As always.

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:55 am
Reply to  TheGrantNapear

Closer to former Duke no.2 pick – Jabari Parker .

TheGrantNapear
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 1:59 pm
Reply to  rockbottom

That’s a good comp. Derrick Williams being another.

markdog333
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 12:35 pm
Reply to  TheGrantNapear

Jabari without the knee issues, or Derrick Williams without…I could never figure out exactly what his issue was. He seemed like he could do just about anything on the basketball court at times.

SlamsonsRollerskates
Comments
Comments
June 14, 2022 10:45 am

If a player that Toronto loves falls to #4, think they go for a package centered around #4 and Holmes for OG?

King4life
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
June 14, 2022 10:53 am

That seems like an overpay for a 3 and D wing, especially one who picks up random injuries throughout a season.

He’s a good starter and the team could use good starters but I’d rather roll the dice with the #4 pick than trade it for a role player.

SlamsonsRollerskates
Comments
Comments
June 14, 2022 11:07 am
Reply to  King4life

Injuries are definitely a huge concern. I do love his defense and fit with the team, though. Plus salary wise I think we would save a few mil after moving off Holmes contract and the #4 pick.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 2:23 pm

OG isn’t good enough or healthy enough to be worth the #4 pick.

jwalker1395
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:36 am

Quick! Take the athletic Duke big man with limited shooting and defense! BEFORE SOMEONE ELSE GETS HIM!!!

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:38 am
Reply to  jwalker1395

The athletic Duke big w/incredible playmaking & driving skills. He isn’t Bagley.

Hobby916
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:44 am
Reply to  richie88

Yeah, they are not even comparable prospects.

Gregoryl
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 11:45 am
Reply to  Hobby916

“Says who?!”

comment image

Last edited 1 year ago by Gregoryl
andy_sims
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 12:10 pm
Reply to  Gregoryl

Nothing gets by our on-crack staff.

Gregoryl
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 1:19 pm
Reply to  andy_sims

The brain trust has smoken, I mean spoken.

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 11:58 am
Reply to  richie88

Closer to Jabari Parker former Duke no. 2 !

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 12:01 pm
Reply to  rockbottom

Parker didn’t have Banchero’s playmaking ability.

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 3:09 pm
Reply to  richie88

He was better in most ways at Duke and former No. 1 HS player . Reason he went 2nd. Hope you are right but see an over rated player with bust potential .

Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 1:18 pm
Reply to  rockbottom

Banchero comps to Parker in almost no way other than they’re both Dukies and the play basketball. This is how I know you and Grant haven’t watched a single minute of available footage on the guy, not to mention that for every big name failure out of Duke there’s one who was every bit as good as advertised and carved out a decent career for themselves.
For what its worth, I hate Duke. And I still find these myopic takes lazy, net-zero contributions to the discussion.
#Grantsrant

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 1:26 pm
Reply to  Sacto_J

At first glance I would hang a (UK alum) Julius Randle-ish comp on him.

Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 1:51 pm
Reply to  RobHessing

I could see that, tho I think Paolo is way more fluid and a better distributor at this stage than Randle was.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 3:26 pm
Reply to  Sacto_J

And a much better shooter. At this age, and even now aside from one outlier season, Randle has a hard time scoring outside the paint.

In shot, he isn’t much like Randle at all.

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 3:11 pm
Reply to  Sacto_J

You may be correct but watch him I have . Parker No. 1 in HS and No. 2 in draft . Bet you never watched him at Duke .

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Reply to  Sacto_J

Parker had stats at Duke better in most areas . 19.1 pts, 8.7 rbs. 36% on 3’s, 47.3% overall . Sure- no comparison

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 3:27 pm
Reply to  rockbottom

Parker was also an excellent prospect that eventually fell short of expectations due to injury and attitude issues. Not because of talent.

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 9:06 am

Not true regarding attitude issues . You can not find any legit backing on this issue . Injuries , maybe ,but a huge disappointment even before .

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 15, 2022 10:24 am
Reply to  rockbottom

I mean, aside from being on record for not being interested in playing defense.

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 9:09 am
Reply to  Bryant

Both may well be compared to Banchero in a few years . I hope to be wrong on him but see a real chance to bust .

jwalker1395
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 12:20 pm
Reply to  richie88

I jest. Banchero is miles better than Bagley was as a prospect.

Still, if we unexpectedly jump in the lottery to land a Duke big man that falls short of expectations, we’d have to conclude that time is a flat circle here in Basketball Hell.

Last edited 1 year ago by Jacob Walker
Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 1:31 pm

Another solid dive, BWest. I surprisingly hadn’t thought of the Webber comp, probably because Webber had so much damn swagger and I haven’t admittedly watched enough Duke basketball to see whether Paolo has that as well.
The guy I though he most closely resembled in recent history was Blake Griffin. Like, a lot. They move similarly, see the floor similarly (Paolo might be a better passer!) and have similar shots and leaping ability. Griffin also didn’t have a great 3 pt. shot but eventually developed a decent one, maybe Paolo recognizes its improved utility in the modern day game and adds that early, who knows.
I agree that there’s a little more work to be done with the offense if the Kings were to pick him, but I also agree that it’s not the kind of problem you avoid if you have the chance to draft him.

Mephariel
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:32 pm
Reply to  Sacto_J

If Paolo had Griffin’s explosiveness, he would be the #1 pick no question. On the other hand, I don’t think Griffin had the mid-range game like Banchero.

Hobby916
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 7:32 am
Reply to  Mephariel

Think Detroit Pistons version of Blake, before he decided to not really play or try.

Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 10:02 am
Reply to  Hobby916

Yeah, ok.

aplumley
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 1:41 pm

This is my least favorite “top tier” prospect. I have him at #5 on my board. The lack of motor and instincts on the defensive end worry me, and the games I watched I would think “WTF is he doing on defense” way too many times. Yes there are guys that figure it out once they get to the pros (Tatum, Simmons), but there are guys that don’t (Parker, Fredette, Bagley). He best case scenario to me is a bigger, but slightly less skilled Carmelo, who was All-NBA but also limited his team’s upside, and his worst case is Jabari Parker. Chet’s only real negative is his slight frame, Smith doesn’t really have a glaring weakness other than his creation ability, if that. Ivey has huge upside, but may not be as great against other elite athletes. Keegan is the best player today, but is 22 so he might be more of a finished product. Paulo has a glaring defensive liability, in both motor and decision making. This is why I have Smith, Chet, Murray, Ivey and then Paulo. But I could see the argument for changing that order in any permutation and wouldn’t be too upset. This is the first draft where I don’t hate any of the prospects, although I’d be very nervous about taking Sharpe at 4 (too little known about him).

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 1:52 pm
Reply to  aplumley

Not for nothing, but I’m going to guess that Carmelo winds up in the HOF. I would take a HOFer at #4 in this draft, rings be damned.

TheGrantNapear
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 2:01 pm
Reply to  aplumley

Melo was one of the most highly skilled scorers of the past decade and a half, not seeing that with Paolo.

RobHessing
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Author
June 14, 2022 2:10 pm
Reply to  TheGrantNapear

I’m curious, what do you see / not see that most of these prognosticators don’t / do? I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m just curious what lights someone’s hot take. You seem to genuinely dislike Banchero, and I’m wondering what guys like Vecenie and Givony and West and others have missed.

Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 10:06 am
Reply to  RobHessing

I’m pretty sure Grant’s hot takes are fueled by regret and bitterness.

aplumley
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 2:14 pm
Reply to  TheGrantNapear

He can score at three levels and I’m using Melo as his best case scenario. I see similarities in their games.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 3:29 pm
Reply to  aplumley

Banchero is less of a scorer, and a much better passer.

UpgradedToQuestionable
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 6:01 pm

I had seen the comps to CWebb and it does fit the bill as a scorer and passer and defender. Remember, original Golden State CWebb was in that crazy draft day trade back in the day of 1993.

Just for kicks:
1993 NBA Draft:
1 – Chris Webber
2- Shawn Bradley
3 – Penny Hardaway
4 – Jamal Mashburn
5 – Isiah Rider
6 – Calbert Cheaney
7 – Bobby Hurley
8 – Vin Baker
9 – Rodney Rodgers
10 – Lindsay Hunter
11 – Allan Houston
12 – George Lynch

Bonus* #1 Evers Burns, #44 Alex Holcombe, #52 Mike Peplowski (Holcombe never played an NBA game which is he may have escaped your memory)

Want2win
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 8:20 pm

I wonder if Bobby would have had a decent run had the accident not happened..

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 9:13 am
Reply to  Want2win

I remember a John Stockton comment saying Hurley could well be a premier point if given time . ( after Dream Team scrimmage ). Of course Time cut very short !

Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 10:07 am
Reply to  rockbottom

Not to make fun of tragedy, but that was so Kangz before we even had a word for it.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 2:15 pm
Reply to  aplumley

I think Banchero’s ceiling is more likely to be Griffin w/a bit less athleticism.

aplumley
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 2:33 pm
Reply to  richie88

I don’t see the Griffin comp. Griffin was an absolute athletic freak coming into the league. Similar to Williamson in that regard. Griffin was limited offensively, other than just out-athleticing everyone, early in his career. He didn’t shoot any 3s and was under 60% from the line, wasn’t really a ball handler at all. He was just faster, stronger, and could jump higher than anyone else, and backed it up with effort, Paolo doesn’t look nearly as explosive and has a somewhat limited motor, but has a lot of offensive tools, three level scoring, and ball handling. I don’t see any similarities. Banchero comps better with Jabari Parker on the down side and Anthony on the up side, IMO.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 3:30 pm
Reply to  aplumley

The better comp would be Griffin in his healthy DET season, after he had lost a bit of athleticism and gained a lot of skill. Which was arguably his best season in the NBA.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 8:07 pm
Reply to  aplumley

I wasn’t talking about Griffin’s rookie season. Griffin’s playmaking eventually improved to a point where he was a skilled playmaking big like Banchero.

Sacto_J
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 10:12 am
Reply to  aplumley

Griffin came into the league broken and had to sit a year. He also had a decent mid range game, craftiness under the basket, above average explosiveness, could lead a break. All things I’ve seen in Banchero’s game. Paolo has better offensive awareness, a little less explosiveness. Comps are tough, there’s no such thing as clones so no ones gonna be spot on.
The Webber comp comes up a lot. I can see it. But Webber was way better coming out of college, IMO. Comps are never gonna be 1 for 1 until we have a better handle on cloning.

Mephariel
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:36 pm
Reply to  aplumley

“Smith doesn’t really have a glaring weakness other than his creation ability…” I am surprised this isn’t a bigger concern actually. Is it easier to develop playmaking skills or shooting skills? I would argue the latter. That is not to say I wouldn’t take Smith in a heartbeat, but shot creation isn’t something you take lightly.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 15, 2022 10:26 am
Reply to  Mephariel

“Aside from that, Mr. Lincoln, how was the play.”

NorCalKingsFan
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 5:35 pm

I can say I’d be disappointed if we left the draft with Banchero, it would feel like somewhat of a loss. I believe he’s the worst fit in the top 10…I’m not enamored with his skill set since we already have a better version of him and I like so many other prospects more (I like Murray, Ivey and Daniels more) and I don’t see the high ceiling that others do. I would rather trade the pick, move down, and select a wing.

Last edited 1 year ago by NorCalKingsFan
BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 6:07 pm
Reply to  NorCalKingsFan

I’m sorry, who is the “better version” of Banchero that we already have?

Last edited 1 year ago by BestHyperboleEver
richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 8:07 pm

Presumably Sabonis.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 8:54 pm
Reply to  richie88

I guess. But since they’re entirely different types of scorers/playmakers I really can’t get behind the comparison. Sabonis is a post/elbow/short-roll playmaker. Whereas, Banchero makes his way as a face-up, off the dribble type. Heck, it might be worth it just to run the double big PnR with Banchero as the ball-handler.

richie88
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
Comments
Original Member
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 1:17 am

I tend to agree, but I’ve seen plenty of Paolo/Sabonis comparisons.

Hobby916
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 7:38 am
Reply to  richie88

The common ones I have seen are Webber, Detroit Blake Griffin, and Julius Randle. Some mix of playmaking and shot creation while facing up and being able to hit outside shots at a decent clip.

Imdahdude
Original Member
Original Member
Imdahdude
June 14, 2022 5:38 pm

If the Kings trade this pick for anything other than a young all star I will be done with this team! That will be it.

Want2win
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
June 14, 2022 8:10 pm

Great write up.. so he is a bigger more athletic version of Keegan Murray,who doesn’t shoot or defend as well as Keegan so he really is just a wannabe Keegan light.. I’m kidding!

rockbottom
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 9:15 am
Reply to  Want2win

You may be kidding but likely correct !

outrider
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 8:46 pm

Who is the best two-way player likely to be available at 4? Is there anybody who isn’t a coat rack on D who can also score a bit as well?

I’m tired of having a team of non defenders (DM excluded) and guys who are “decent defenders when engaged”, except they’re never engaged.

BestHyperboleEver
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Original Member
June 14, 2022 8:56 pm
Reply to  outrider

Likely? So that would mean excluding Smith, Holmgren and Banchero? Then the most likely positive on both ends 2-way player is probably Murray.

outrider
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 9:45 pm

Thank you. That’s what I was thinking, but I wanted a second opinion.

This is assuming the three guys you listed are all gone by 4.

Milkman
Comments
Comments
June 14, 2022 8:59 pm

The CWebb/Vlade comparison is interesting. I actually thought of another duo (jump in the time machine for this one)….I thought about the Larry Johnson/ Alonzo Mourning duo. Banchero/Sabonis/Fox would be like Grandmama/Mourning/Muggsy…but with worst rim protection. How far did those Hornets go…2nd round? I guess 2nd round would be a dream for Kings fans right now.

Mephariel
Comments
Vote Up
Comments
Vote Up
June 14, 2022 10:41 pm
Reply to  Milkman

What about a less athletic Shawn Kemp?

Milkman
Comments
Comments
June 15, 2022 1:40 am
Reply to  Mephariel

Or a more skilled Otis Thorpe?

markdog333
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
Patreon Supporter
Comments
Vote Up
June 15, 2022 12:48 pm
Reply to  Milkman

I had to look that up. Zo only played 3 seasons in Charlotte, and they made it to the second round his rookie year. The won more games but were eliminated in the first round after that.

Badge Legend

Patreon Supporter Patreon Supporter   Registered On Day 1 Registered On Day 1   Published Post Published Post  Published Post Nostradumbass
Comment Up Votes 200 Up Votes   Comment Up Votes 500 Up Votes    1,000 Up Votes    3,000+ Up Votes

Comments 50 Comments   Comments 100 Comments    250 Comments    500 Comments    1000+ Comments