For nearly a month now we’ve been hearing talk about the Boston Celtics being interested in Sacramento Kings forward Harrison Barnes. For that same length of time we’ve also heard, via Sam Amick, that “sources say teams have been given the impression that the Kings have no interest in moving Barnes.”
And yet it seems the Celtics are still in pursuit.
In a recent segment on the Celtics post game show, Brian Scalabrine said “Let me translate what’s been going on. I’ll help everybody out so we don’t have to worry and guess anymore. The Celtics want Harrison Barnes.”
"The Celtics want Harrison Barnes …. Don’t listen to all the smoke and mirrors about all these other guys."
Sorting through trade rumors with @tvabby + @Scalabrine, and why Barnes is more realistic than Grant or Vucevic. pic.twitter.com/QPLDXURyj2
— Chris Forsberg (@ChrisForsberg_) March 5, 2021
Barnes makes perfect sense for what the Celtics are looking for, but the Kings are operating from a position of strength. Barnes is a reliable player and the Kings appear to be in no hurry to move him.
As for what the Celtics might return, Celtics analyst Chris Forsberg said the following:
“Probably going to have to send out a young player, someone like a Romeo Langford or Aaron Nesmith, and then draft picks as well. But I think that’s a fair price to pay for a guy who slides right in as a fourth option…”
The trade deadline is March 25th, but with half the season over and a natural break for the All-Star hiatus, we could see teams begin to make moves any day now.
Picks or it doesn’t happen!
ISWYDT 🙂
Have not participated in the comments section in a long while. Life has been crazy. You have no idea how happy I am to be able to up thumb this to purple status as my first action in months. 🙂
Danny ainge still needs to be willing to offer up something more than a garbage offer.
Exactly- Ainge isn’t known as the best trading partner… FO should continue negotiating from a position of strength.
yeah but most think he is starting to feel the pressure to sell off some of those stacked assets for contending pieces
He kept hoarding picks and now they’re all kind of middle of the road to low level contributing young guys that he can’t get rid of.
I don’t know if it’s true, but it feels like ainge can’t make a deal without the celts coming out looking like a clear winner.
I agree, but now looking like a clear winner could be taking the team from 4/5 seed in the east back into the top 1/2 seed
You don’t need to convince me that, just ainge. 😉 that team is so close to competing for multiple rings with one or two players added.
Forsberg’s guess at what the Kings might expect in return seems pretty on the nose. It’s nice having someone in charge that knows how to play hard-to-get. If Barnes goes, I don’t think that Sacramento will feel ripped off.
And if he stays, that’s all right, too.
I think they heavily consider sending Tristan Thompson back and we send them Holmes as a way to help them with their money cap. I only do this for a hefty charge.
barnes, holmes, belly for Nesmith, Langford, Grant Williams, Thompson, Bos 1st.
if they feel they are losing too much for a couple of guys that are potential 1 year rentals we take out belly and either Langford or Williams but not both
Robert Williams or no trade!
I’m starting to move off him as a requirement because of his injury history and lack of shooting. I think of him as a younger Holmes tbh
I don’t know if Holmes is the right comp. Williams is a better shotblocker and passer. If Bagley’s shooting is for real, then I could see a Bagley/Williams frontcourt grow into a decent pairing.
I’m not sure they’re a good pairing since that would be a really undersized front court. But I’m also not making decisions based on fit with Bagley.
You’re correct. We shouldn’t be concerned about fit just getting talent for fair value.
Higher end talent is sorely needed.
yeah I mean I’d do the deal regardless of if Bagley is here long-term. I am curious how they would pair though.
One other thing I’ll add is that the various plus minus stats are all over the place on Williams. He has the worst DRPM among centers this season for instance. But he seems to fair considerably better with D-RAPTOR and DBPM and D-LEBRON. I’m sure there’s plenty of reason, but when I see that level of variance I get intrigued. To me, it feels like he’s still learning how to defend, his total MP isn’t enough for any of these stats to be predictive, but also he may be miscast in his role on Boston.
If you combine them, they make one good player!
That’s actually kinda what I was thinking!
yeah if people think Holmes is too small for full time center then look out for Williams
Though their effective size is probably about the same. Holmes has a inch or two in height on Williams. But Williams has 4-5 inch advantage in wingspan. So their vertical reach is likely pretty similar.
Williams is big time undersized for starting Center and really injury prone.
Watch a lot of Celtic games. Williams is basically Holmes and might not be as good although a bit younger. Undersized big, who can’t shoot from the perimeter but plays with a big heart and runs the court well. Bigs who can’t shoot with range are not commanding a big salary. Steven Adams a beast inside just took a fairly sizable haircut on his most recent contract. Montrez Harrell only got 2 years for 19 mil and he’s better than both Williams and Holmes. I think we can get Holmes fairly reasonably in the off-season with the hope we can improve further from their and Holmes becomes a high volume backup. I’d take Pritchard and a first. That would solidify the backcourt for several years and provide some depth there. I would like to see Buddy subsequently moved for Aaron Gordon or just a salary dump if we made the trade I proposed. I would not move Barnes without a decent haul like the one I suggested.
I agree that Williams is basically Holmes, though he’s a better rim-protector and has more upside. So wouldn’t you rather get that player on rookie deal salary for this year and next, then as an RFA, rather than on a FA market rate?
That’s a fair point but if I’m fairly confident I can sign Holmes without overpaying, I rather have Pritchard. I haven’t seen enough of Nesmith. Sometimes a name gets thrown out and the pack mentality picks it us and runs with it and I wonder how many of these folks have even seen Nesmith play. I watch a lot of basketball and I haven’t seen enough of Nesmith.
You would be judging him based on his college profile as well. Lately, he’s been getting roughly Pritchard level minutes. I mean, neither of them have put in enough NBA time to really judge. Ultimately, they’re both likely useful rotation players in different roles. Do you want a reliable back-up PG or a 3-and-average D wing. I think they both end up being roughly 7-9 guys in a good team’s rotation.
Personally, I’m happy with either.
I think Pritchard can/will be a high volume backup with a Patty Mills upside. Haven’t seen enough of Nesmith to fairly comment but Pritchard can really shot it, he’s smart, NBA ready and his defense isn’t bad.
Yeah. Pritchard has done well. He’s had the advantage of having Kemba hurt and Teague fall off a cliff, and done well with the opportunity. Nesmith slots in behind their two best players, so even if may have “deserved” more minutes than he’s gotten, they’re tougher to come by. Obviously, I’m not at their practices so I have no idea how he has looked. I’m basing my opinion on the time he’s gotten recently and his college production.
His shooting has really fallen off in the last few weeks, also coinciding with their losing streak. I feel like on a good team, he’s great. Asked to be the primary table setter on the kings, he might not look better than cory Joseph is what I’d be scared of.
Nesmith is ready. I bet he’ll be a major contributor.
But Williams has constant injury issues where holmes doesn’t. Just another factor, I’d definitely take Williams
Barnes + Whiteside for Nesmith, RWIII, 2021 1st and another decent pick. Probably the crazy 2023 2nd.
Boston won’t do that. Obviously you take it but it’s unrealistic.
Probably not. But that’s where I’d start the conversation. It’s high, but not crazy. Which is generally the right place for the seller to start.
If you’re saying it as a negotiating strategy then yes.
I’d settle for just Nesmith, RWII and their 2021 pick.
Sure. I’m just wrapping Whiteside for a 2nd in there.
They’d want Holmes and I’d give him to them and try to resign him
Same. I have no problem trading Holmes for future assets. Kings stand just as much chance to get him back this summer as anyone else. Trading him to a contender may actually be beneficial to him, both to his game and his pocketbook.
Yeah he could really appreciate that and I’d think it’d be an easy sell while still looking really good with the player.
“Holmes we LOVE you man, really want you to be apart of the future but we can have a win/win by trading you to a contender which helps us build for the future, while you get to go play for a championship, raise your value and come back home in the offseason.”
Exactly.
This is good
Holmes doesn’t really give them anything they don’t currently have. Unless they move RW3, of course. They’re chock full of undersized Cs with Thompson, Theis, RW3, Grant Williams, etc.
Well he gives them an improved version of all of those guys…which obviously helps for this season
We probably have to take thompson back and throw in Holmes to get Nesmith, RW and the 1st
You’re talking about Klay…right…RIGHT?
Barnes + Whiteside for Nesmith, RWIII, 2021 1st and another decent pick.
Probably the crazy 2023 2nd.DEAL
AND 1!!!!!!!!
We should at least expect a Duck as part of the package or tell Ainge to get lost.
The Boston duck boat can take the starting five onto the court!
I’d love to see the DUCK ride down the river and drop the team off at Old Sac. Then they ride BIRDs to G1C.
I think Ainge will find a way to make a move with that TPE and the pressure you can tell is mounting with Celtics fans/media for Ainge to finally make a swing. Will it be Barnes? Hard to say if Shams is reporting that multiple teams are interested. Find out those offers from the interested teams and see if you can leverage a team to give you a bit more.
I feel like Kemba is on his way out in Boston. If I’m Boston, I’m not beating the Nets this year, so why give up young players that can be packaged along with Kemba’s max contract for another 3rd star in the future.
But I’m glad I’m not Boston! BARNES FOR PICKS AND YOUNGINS! DO IT MONTE!
You misspelled 76ers. 🙂
It was an either/or ð
Sixers are the biggest threat to BKN. Or the other way around if that floats your boat haha
The Celtics winning their last 4 has coincided with Kemba getting back to his level. I think the rumors about Kemba leaving are probably highly overstated.
The guy is often injured. The teague pick up has not helped how desperately they need a table setter. It’s why the playmaking from Gordon has been so missed. Barnes can be a secondary or a tertiary playmaker.
This is literally the first season is his career Barnes hasn’t been objectively terrible as a playmaker. I really don’t think a smart team is going to acquire him counting on him playing that role.
That’s why I said secondary or tertiary. On the warriors, he had a much smaller role and excelled. The mavs he didn’t do so hot as the top dog, but the celts have two top dogs already.
The standard for an NBA secondary or tertiary playmaker is pretty high. With the Warriors, he’d probably would have been considered more of a quinary playmaker among the starters. And septenary on the team.
I guess I just see it as being ideal considering Kemba and the two j’s would be doing most of the play making. If kemba is out injured, then barnes gets to be the release from those two, and he can make the right decision to shoot or pass it along to someone else after.
Also, that warriors team was pretty stacked, huh?
This is definitely just grasping at straws on my behalf, no truth to my claims, but I’m just saying they’ve been looking for that 3rd guy for years and they’re still middle of the pack in the East even with Kemba, so if they shake it up, it’s probably Kemba and not Brown/Tatum. Again, they are not beating the Nets.
Something is just not right there. They need more of a playmaker/defender rather than another scorer to bring it all together.
If they can get Barnes, Holmes and Belly from us I’d give them a legit shot to beat the Nets
Yikes.
To each their own.
Kemba/pp
Smart/teague
Jb/barnes
Jt/belly
Holmes/theis/R Williams
Yeah I’ll take my chances, that’s deep af with a lot of versatility
Anyone else just check out the Kings box score now to see what Barnes and Buddy did? Couldn’t care less abt anyone else’s numbers at this point…
They need to trade Buddy ASAP. This might be the hottest stretch he’ll have this season.
Coming off the break, knowing him he might be ice cold.
I agree with this.
The article starts off with this.
For nearly a month now we’ve been hearing talk about the Boston Celtics being interested in Sacramento Kings forward Harrison Barnes.
We’ve heard this many times already. Why don’t we hold off on any more articles until we hear something new and reliable.
come on.
Scalabrine works for Celtics TV. This is the equivalent of Kayte going on and saying the Kings want to tank. It’s a story, and unfortunately it’s also another great example of what we lack here in town with our sports media.
Posts seven comments in thread / does not think it’s worth discussing.
It’s been written many times, so it’s worth discussing but what’s new besides another person saying the same thing. It’s kind of like another article on Dedmon. You recall how well you’ve did with that. Of course you’re more qualified than Kayte Hunter because you’ve played the game and coached it at a high level.
(8)
Every once in awhile in needs to know he has the same 10 people following him.
Watching your recent performance here, I can see why the remaining posters at StR are able to bat you around like a cat toy.
Dedmon walking.
seems like he isn’t wanted on either site
mindless suck ass who can’t think for himself.
If you’ve seen what’s left at Str that’s a compliment. You’d do well there. I was hoping that site survived because I like the writers and I want them to succeed. I didn’t post until this pandemic in a desperate search for entertainment but I noticed the remaining guys keep mentioning this jerk otis. Now I know who they are referring to, the guy who’s never dribbled a basketball but claims to be Phil Jackson.
Otis isn’t the jerk. I’m the jerk!
(it’s true)
My god, now I feel bad making fun of you. There’s been no greater cry for help posted on this website.
From your friends at Str
I can’t stand Otis, Greg etc and will rec any post blasting them on that site
What a world this blogging. Thank god it appears high school basketball and AAU will resume shortly.
OH NOES
Damn. 16 down votes.
Here’s 17.
What would happen if the roles were reversed? Headlines around the nba: The Kings want (insert name)!
what happens? nothing. no one gives a shit what player the kings might want except for us.
“Kings interested in LeBron James”
“Commissioner Adam Silver has fined the Kings for idiotic tampering.”
I do that deal asap if it’s on the table and I think McNair does as well. There’s no reason not pull the trigger unless owners are still trying to make the playoffs, which is folly at this point.
We trade Barnes and then draft Barnes. You heard it here first.
I think you mean keep Bagley and draft Bagley.
Saving money on uniforms, press releases, locker labels. That’s just good business!
We fire Luke, then fire Bill.
Not convinced they will trade Barnes, unless Monte has decided to do full-scale teardown, but that has DEFINITELY not ever been a Vivek strategy. I think he stays, which would be a clear sign who’s still in charge
I’ve not seen anything suggesting a goal other than a teardown since McNair took over. If he had traded for or signed Barnes, then moving HB would be a change of direction. This only seems like another step along the path chosen.
Huh.
Kings Trade Rumors: Marvin Bagley III Receiving Minimal Interest amid Struggles
Not surprising. Any GM worth his weight in salt knows Bagley’s limitations. It would need to be a team that really thinks they can develop him, and I’m guessing there are zero that think they can.
The entire reason any team would trade for him is because they think they could get him for peanuts. Which, of course, means the Kings would have no incentive to move him.
Check out this monstrosity:
I managed to beat my old fake trade record of -22 wins for the Kings.
Also LOL on the Rockets +18 with that poo poo platter
How did you get the image so clear? When i select the image icon on the bottom right, mine was super crappy.
Tate, Nunn, and a First? Sign me up yesterday lol
I use an image sharing site (https://imgbb.com/). I upload the image onto that site, then copy and paste the url into the comment. I’m sure there’s an easier way to do it, but I’m not what you’d call “computer savvy.”
Thanks! I appreciate it
I’m reading this as us trading four okay guys and a likely lottery pick for six okay guys and a first-rounder that’s all-but a second-rounder.
Bagley still has a higher ceiling than anyone that we’d get back. Leonard would be a decent get, but it seems like it would be possible to get him without a scheme this complicated.
I threw up in my mouth a little.
Keep in mind, I really just like seeing the obscene win projections. Although, I do think Wood/Bagley would be a weird duo I’d like to see. And Nwaba is just a guy Ive always wanted on the Kings.
I read a badly written article the other day from toronto. Some Raptors Fans think Nick Nurse can make Bagley a star. Just sayin… Call Toronto Monte!!
I mean, if Bagley did go to Toronto or Golden State or Miami or San Antonio the media would have a field day about how they can turn him into something.
I’d have blind confidence too if I turned Van Vleet, Siakam, and 2nd to undrafted dudes into a championship roster.
Translation: Let’s prepare the fans for when we have to trade him for peanuts.
Yeah, that statement doesn’t make any sense. You can almost certainly deal Bagley for a second and dead salary. If you’re trying to get any value, then yeah sure, no one is interested. (I can’t read the article, so don’t know what it actually says.)
The FO just threw him under the bus. Maybe it’s payback for pops throwing them under the bus so many times.
I mean, I think Bagley’s play threw him under the bus.
The article said due to his struggles the last two years. I mean, that suggests injury history and not his talent or lack of it, no?
I mean, I’m all on board for young guys and picks only like you, but it’s just better to suck with him on the team and see if he can redeem any of his value for trading in the offseason or keeping if he’s good towards the end. No sense in trading him for nothing.
Do that deal! Yesterday. HB is worth young players and a first rounder. We can tank and get another first rounder.
I’m not the biggest fan of Robert Williams but I would do this if it meant less Cojo.
Clearly that looks good!
Im not sure why its so blury LOL but click on it..
Barnes and Bjelica for Pritchard, Nesmith, Tristan Thompson, and a first
Nesmith hasnt shown much of anything but I included him because we want to see what he’s got. Thompson was just salary. I think this is fair for both sides.
Nesmith has looked much better the last few weeks
Is his value sky rocketting? Could you explain how so?
Sky rocketing? No, but he has been playing much better defense of late and hitting shots. This is all from Boston fans as I’ve been on their blog with the trade stuff around Barnes to them.
Well, you said he seemed to be improving, and now you say his value couldn’t be described as “skyrocketing.” Why didn’t you just say his value was skyrocketing in order to make clear that was a a lock for first-ballot Hall of Famer?
I dunno, man, it seemed pretty clear what it was that you wrote.
I almost had that go right over my head…I was very confused at the confusion haha
It’s a lot. I can run pretty far off the page before I find my way back.
I think we’d have to throw in Holmes in that trade to replace them losing thompson and getting PP. I’d do it for sure and try to resign him in the offseason
I like this. If you do it I think you have to either flip Thompson immediately or trade Holmes immediately. either or. trading Holmes probably gets you more assets so…
That said, I really like Harrison Barnes. Wish they would focus on getting Buddy, Bagley, Cojo and Belly out of here. don’t care that much about their “current value” and what they will return. Budd’s value “couldn’t get any lower” in December when the season was about to start yet here we are, Buddy’s value is significantly lower then where we thought it couldn’t go any lower.
Trade Bagley now, move on. invest in the guys you know you want and MOVE FORWARD
The Kings would be stupid not to trade Barnes while he has value. Great guy, and average player who is overpaid and not on the team’s timeline. If you can get anything of value for that, you do it.
Yup, and there is no time like the present. This all-star break would be the ideal time for Boston to want to make this deal. They don’t play again until next Thursday. They could make the trade and have Barnes go through protocols and ready for the team by then. No beats skipped.
Trading for Barnes closer to the deadline means likely losing a rotational player (Nesmith and/or Williams) for a few games until Barnes can pass physicals, clear covid, and make the move to Boston. Boston is not in a position to wait a few games as everyone counts in a playoff race.
I’ll also add that it might be good for the Kings to make that trade ASAP as well, A possible injury to Barnes aside, the Kings have a pretty weak schedule for the month of March. Moving Barnes now for youth and a pick may help the Kings avoid any unnecessary wins against lottery competitors.
That’s probably all that needs to be said assuming he really does have value.
I have a question for everyone that says “Barnes isn’t a fit for our timeline”. What is our timeline? Layout the years you have decided is the timeline
You’re not my supervisor.
IMO, the Kings aren’t making the playoffs until at least the 2022-23 season. By then Buddy and Barnes are on the wrong side of 30 and their deals are coming to an end. This also happens to be right when we hope Fox, Hali, Bagley and this year’s top pick are coming into their own.
If we are under the mindset that Barnes and Buddy are not going to be apart of the next Kings playoff run(s) then why are we keeping them? They are assets that can be sold off for youth or future assets that best fit with the growth curve of Fox, Hali, Bagley, etc. Creating a contender is a long game in the NBA and GMs need to think at least 3 years out. A Lebron is not going to decide to come to Sac so the Kings need to do it on their own.
An example, I read an article a while back about how Miami targeted Jimmy Butler back when he was traded to Minny from Chicago. They made him their priority due to their culture and coaching staff. They then made moves to line themselves up to get him, but it took a couple of years. It resulted in them making the Finals last year.
Monte needs to have a similar mindset and realize that Buddy and Barnes may be in the twilights of their careers when the next good Kings team makes a run, and that getting there means cashing in when you can to play the long game.
I am with you on this. While I totally get the Trade Barnes sentiment with looking at value and the possible return with the Kings future in mind, I also think we should keep Barnes.
That said, I wont be upset if he is traded for some potentially good future pieces but the key word there is potentially. Barnes is good NOW, has seemingly found new heights to his game and he’s only 28. The contract we have him under is while he is in his PRIME years and he’s proving that now. He’ll be tradable for every day over the rest of his contract if thats a direction you want to go at some point. That said, the guy is a great fit with Fox and Burt, he is a good Vet leader and an excellent human by all accounts.
If it were me, I’d keep Barnes and do anything and everything to trade the pieces that are part of the problem, not the ones that are part of the solution. Focus all energy on trading Buddy, Bagley, Whiteside, Cojo, Belly. is their value low or high? I don’t care, the value is what it is and there’s a very slim chance it could go up DRAMATICALLY if we wait a year for trading Bagley or Buddy. so why are we waiting to trade them exactly? because maybe it might get us an extra second round pick in a trade 6 months from now? I just dont see some drastic improvement from Bagley or Buddy that would really affect much in the future trade value of both those dudes.
My core = Fox, Burt, (Barnes, Holmes). With Holmes and Barnes being secondary Core pieces and always available for moving in a big trade that makes the kings significantly better right then and there not potentially better 3 years from now.
I realized I didnt answer your question. oops. My time line depends on trades like I guess it does for all of us.
If Bagley and Buddy are traded this month then I see a Kings Playoff birth in 2022.
What assets are returned from trading those two dudes? who knows but the pieces would hopefully make the bench deeper at worst and add some future draft assets at worst. This also free’s up a bunch of cash to look at a piece in free agency that could make a large impact with this roster.
Roster =
PG: Fox, Guy
SG: Burt, Ramsey, James
SF: Top 5 draft pick, Jefferies, Woodard
PF: Barnes,
C: Holmes, Metu
Obviously would have to add in the return you’d get in trading Bagley and Buddy right now. What is that return? Aaron Gordon for Buddy? A solid role player and a couple future firsts top 5 protected for Bagley?
The timeline can be as early as 12 months from now. competing, improving
I agree with a lot here. I like Barnes. He is the type of person I like and want on my team.
That said, I think Buddy, Barnes, and Holmes are kind of at their ceilings. We suck with them. How can we continue to improve if they make large $$ and we far from an 8 seed.
I would move Buddy and Bagley eventually. As much as I support Bagley, his body language sometimes is annoying. I feel as if he doesnt want to be here or doesnt accept his deficiencies. Adding, to me, he has improved this year.
I honestly don’t think this team is far away from competing for an eighth seed with Fox/Hali, this year’s first rounder and a few shrewd moves. Smart teams aren’t taking nearly as long to improve to that level as the olden days (shakes fist).
Two seasons? But getting anchor contracts like Barnes and Hield off the books would give McNair some cap space to leverage as a trade asset.
I think that depends entirely on the pick this year and next. Fox and Hali aren’t getting this team to the playoffs without another higher end talent (not Bagley).
For the record, I dont have a problem with keeping Barnes. We are 14-22.
We are tied for the 5th pick while being relatively healthy, trying to actually win games, and shortening the bench. To me, this indicates that we are closer to the 1st pick than we are to the playoffs. The Grizzlies have the 10 seed (Play In Tourney) at at 16-16.
I am not sure if they will have the play in tournament next year?
Barnes has had a stellar year. I like what he brings to the table, professionalism at it’s finest. His value could improve more areas of the team. I propsed a trade with Boston sending HB and Bjelica to land Pritchard, Nesmith, Tristan Thompson, and a 1st rounder.
Going into the offseason with more talent and a bit less salary would be a big plus.
Fox, Pritchard, Ramsey, Cojo
Haliburton, Hield, Jeffries
Nesmith, Woodard, James
Bagley
Holmes, Tristan Thompson
Now you have your pick which is currently top 5 and Boston’s pick for an additional role player. Target: Cunningham, Kuminga, Mobley, or Green for the top 5 pick.
Results:
So my Barnes trade, in theory, could alleviate the back up point guard position with Pritchard, provide extra salary for free agency (SF, PF, or a C), land another lottery prospect to develop in Nesmith, and a 1st round pick.
Keeping Barnes may move us around the lottery ranging from 4-10. We keep him for another year and try to trade him as an expiring? Or he leaves for a contender at 29/30 years old?
Zero chance in the next season unless you draft the next Doncic or trade the whole team for a fading star who can drag the squad into the playoffs for year or two. So you’re looking at 22-23 at the earliest, and more likely 23-24.
After the Portland game on Thursday, I had a feeling that this team would look dramatically different the next time they took the floor. I would think Barnes is likely to be a part of any potential fire sale.
That said, I hope McNair plays hardball with Boston. I like Aaron Nesmith, but there needs to be some draft picks changing hands as well.
No Barnes to Boston?
https://sports.yahoo.com/danny-ainge-says-celtics-most-151726818.html
Badge Legend